MHB Proving $x-1$ is a Factor of $P(x)$ with Polynomials

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomials
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
If $P(x),\,Q(x),\,R(x),\,S(x)$ are polynomials such that $P(x^5)+xQ(x^5)+x^2R(x^5)=(x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1)S(x)$, prove that $x-1$ is a factor of $P(x)$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Let $P(x)=a_nx^n+\cdots+a_0x^0$ with $a_n\ne 0$. Comparing the coefficients of $x^{n+1}$ on both sides gives $a_n(n-2m)(n-1)=0$, so $n=1$ or $n=2m$.

If $n=1$, one easily verifies that $P(x)=x$ is a solution, while $P(x)=1$ is not. Since the given condition is linear in $P$, this means that the linear solutions are precisely $P(x)=tx$ for $t\in \mathbb{R} $.

Now, assume that $n=2m$. The polynomial $xP(x+1)-(x+1)P(x)=(n-1)a_nx^n+\cdots$ has degree $n$, and therefore it has at least one (possibly complex) root $r$. If $r\ne \{0,\,-1\}$, define $k=\dfrac{P(r)}{r}=\dfrac{P(r+1)}{r+1}$. If $r=0$, let $k=P(1)$. If $r=-1$, let $k=-P(-1)$. We now consider the polynomial $S(x)=P(x)-kx$. It also satisfies (1) because $P(x)$ and $kx$ satisfy it. Additionally, it has the useful property that $r$ and $r+1$ are roots.

Let $A(x)=x^3-mx^2+1$ and $B(x)=x^3+mx^2+1$. Plugging in $x=s$ into (1) implies that

If $s-1$ and $s$ are roots of $S$ and $s$ is not a root of $A$, then $s+1$ is a root of $S$.
If $s$ and $s+1$ are roots of $S$ and $s$ is not a root of $B$, then $s-1$ is a root of $S$.

Let $a\ge 0$ and $b\ge 1$ be such that $r-a,\,r-a+1,\,\cdots, r,\,r+1,\.\cdots,\,r+b-1,\,r+b$ are roots of $S$, while $r-a-1$ and $r+b+1$ are not. The two statements above imply that $r-a$ is a root of $B$ and $r+b$ is a root of $A$.

Since $r-a$ is a root of $B(x)$ and of $A(x+a+b)$, it is also a root of their greatest common divisior $C(x)$ as integer polynomials. If $C(x)$ was a non-trivial divisor of $B(x)$, then $B$ would have a rational root $\alpha$. Since the first and last coefficients of $B$ are 1, $\alpha$ can only be 1 or $-1$, but $B(-1)=m>0$ and $B(1)=m+2>0$ since $n=2m$.

Therefore $B(x)=A(x+a+b)$. Writing $c=a_b\ge 1$, we compute

$0=A(x+c)-B(x)=(3c-2m)x^2+c(3c-2m)x^2+c(3c-2m)x+c^2(c-m)$

Then we must have $3c-2m=c-m=0$, which gives $m=0$, a contradiction. We could conclude that $f(x)=tx$ is the only solution.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top