Pseudometric Spaces: What Are They and Why Are They Important in Mathematics?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Paige_Turner
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of pseudometric spaces, particularly in relation to Finsler and Riemannian spaces. Participants explore definitions, relationships, and distinctions between these mathematical structures, with a focus on understanding their significance in mathematics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants mention Finsler spaces, noting that they can include pseudometrics and are generally considered a superset of Riemannian spaces.
  • There is a question about the understanding of non-Riemannian pseudometric spaces, with one participant expressing a desire to learn the differences between pseudometric and Riemannian spaces.
  • One participant states that pseudometric spaces are a proper superset of Riemannian spaces, though they admit to not knowing the specifics of the differences.
  • A later reply suggests that a more effective way to engage knowledgeable participants would be to first research basic definitions and then ask specific questions.
  • Another participant defends their approach to asking questions, arguing that they should not need to cite sources for abstract concepts like pseudometric spaces.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of familiarity with the concepts discussed, leading to some disagreement about the definitions and relationships between pseudometric, Finsler, and Riemannian spaces. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus on the distinctions or the importance of these spaces.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference external sources for further reading on Finsler geometry, indicating that there may be additional historical or theoretical context that is not fully explored within the thread itself.

Paige_Turner
Messages
44
Reaction score
9
TL;DR
What is an example non-Riemannian pseudometric space that is not null or trivial?
I suspect you're not supposed to ask short questions here. Mine is in the summary.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Various Finsler spaces? (Usually, Finsler metrics are positive definite, but you can have pseudometrics too.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: wrobel
strangerep said:
Various Finsler spaces?
I never heard of Finsler spaces. Apparently they'e a superset of Riemannian space. But my question involved the latter.
 
What do you understand by non-Riemannian pseudometric space?
 
Paige_Turner said:
I never heard of Finsler spaces. Apparently they'e a superset of Riemannian space. But my question involved the latter.
Umm,... no,... your question involved non-Riemannian spaces.

A Finsler space whose fundamental function (squared) is quadratic in the velocities is Riemannian, but all other Finsler spaces are non-Riemannian.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: robphy
martinbn said:
> What do you understand by non-Riemannian pseudometric space?
I have no idea. It's not my concept. Someone somewhere said that the pseudometric spaces are a proper superset of the Riemannian spaces, but I don't know the difference, and I want to learn what the difference between he two is.

META: Someone asked me not to use the > character to indicate quoted text in replies.

The nonstandard system font I use (apparently) doesn't define whatever characters you use in the editor interface buttons. They look like little rectangles with a unicode hex index inside.

If > isn't okay, how should I indicate quoted text?
 
Last edited:
Paige_Turner said:
If > isn't okay, how should I indicate quoted text?
By using the PF "Reply" feature, which it looks like you are doing okay with. Just don't add an extra character into the quote -- it should be the exact quote from the other person.

When you click-drag a section of another poster's text, then click "Reply", that creates the Quote Box with the other user's username and a little up-arrow that will take folks to the post that the quote came out of.
 
Paige_Turner said:
I have no idea. It's not my concept. Someone somewhere said that the pseudometric spaces are a proper superset of the Riemannian spaces, but I don't know the difference, and I want to learn what the difference between he two is.
Since you're a relatively new PF user, I'll explain that "someone somewhere said" is a good way to get knowlegeable people here to become disinterested in your post.

A likely-more-successful way to get better answers would have been for you to first check what an ordinary Riemannian space is (e.g., on Wikipedia), and what a pseudometric is (also on Wikipedia or other sources available by googling). Similarly, if you google for "pseudo-Riemannian space" you'll get some other references. Then, if anything is still unclear, ask a more specific question here on PF, also mentioning which specific reference sources you have already consulted.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman, martinbn and robphy
  • #10
I said I didn't remember where I read it.

If I had been talking about F=MA, I wouldn't have to cite that. Similarly, since this simple question is something that real physicists know, i thought that they would recognize it and just respond. If not, it isn't worth making a big deal about.

In any case, one would think you could ask a question here about something as abstract as pseudometric space without being required to say who asked it somewhere else or being told to go look up the answer.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: weirdoguy and berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K