Publishing books on arXiv, a new trend?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sbrothy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arxiv Books
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the trend of publishing book-like content on arXiv, particularly focusing on works related to quantum computing and quantum mechanics. Participants explore the nature of these publications, their validity, and the implications of presenting such material in a preprint format.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Debate/contested, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the rigor and scientific validity of a specific work titled "What You Shouldn't Know About Quantum Computers," questioning whether it is typical to find such content on arXiv.
  • Another participant references a long write-up by Franck Laloe, suggesting that it was expanded into a book, indicating that similar cases exist.
  • A later reply acknowledges the preprint nature of the content, suggesting a realization about the format of such publications.
  • One participant humorously questions the absence of a specific iteration of Laloe's work from the Popular Physics category, indicating a playful tone while discussing the categorization of these works.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the appropriateness or commonality of book-like publications on arXiv, with some expressing curiosity and others providing examples, but no definitive agreement is established.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects varying levels of familiarity with arXiv and its publication standards, as well as differing interpretations of the significance of the content being shared.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in the intersection of popular science writing and academic publishing, particularly in the fields of quantum physics and technology.

sbrothy
Gold Member
Messages
1,427
Reaction score
1,290
Didn't really know where to put this but chose this subforum as I'm not willing to defend it's rigorousness nor it's scientific validity (I simply don't know enough about the subject). I also realize it's posted under Popular Physics (physics.pop-ph); Quantum Physics (quant-ph) and the first one always kinda raises a little red flag for me. But this one:

What You Shouldn't Know About Quantum Computers

"Whether you're a CEO strategizing the future of your company, a tech enthusiast debating your next career move, a high school teacher eager to enlighten your students, or simply tired of the relentless quantum hype, this is crafted just for you. Cutting through the complex jargon to deliver the straight facts on quantum computing, peeling away the layers of mystique to reveal the true potential and limitations of this groundbreaking technology. Prepare to have your misconceptions challenged, and your understanding deepened in this clear-eyed view of the quantum future, written to inform and inspire readers across the spectrum of curiosity and need."

looks like the first draft to an actual book. Is this normal? Are there more of these on arXiv?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oooh. Yes preprint. Makes sense to me now. Duh. :)
 
DrClaude said:
Not an entire book, but a long write-up that was expanded into a book:

Franck Laloe

Do we really understand quantum mechanics?​

https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0209123

Incidentally, is it a coincidence that this particular iteration isn’t found on Popular Physics? Has it matured or did you just leave it out? :)

EDIT: Just to be clear: I’m joking, not playing smart!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
62
Views
56K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K