Pull force of magnet calculated at an angle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the pull force between two magnets when the force is applied at an angle rather than perpendicular to the surface. The formula provided, Force_at_angle = cos(angle_from_perpendicular) * Force_at_perpendicular, indicates that the force required decreases as the angle approaches 90 degrees due to the cosine function. The conversation also highlights that magnetic forces arise from moving charges, and the geometry of the magnets, such as cuboid shapes, influences the calculations. A reference to Wikipedia's article on magnetic force calculations is suggested for further understanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics principles, particularly magnetism
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions, especially cosine
  • Knowledge of magnetic force calculations between magnets
  • Basic geometry of shapes, specifically cuboids
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of magnetic force and its dependence on angle
  • Learn about the mathematical derivation of forces between magnets
  • Explore the effects of geometry on magnetic interactions, focusing on cuboid magnets
  • Review the Wikipedia article on calculating magnetic force
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, engineers working with magnetic systems, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of magnetic forces at various angles.

Mozez
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi PF,

A disclaimer, I am no good at Physics or math.

My question:

When calculating the pull force between two magnets it seems to always be calculated at an angle perpendicular to the surface of the magnet.

I was wondering what effect on the force required to "pull" one magnet away from the other would be when a force is applied at a different angle and can this be calculated easier when you already know the pull force at the perpendicular?

I guess I am looking for a way of recalculating the force needed to 'pull' a magnet away from another when the angle of the applied force changes.

Thank you for your time
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Force_at_angle = cos (angle_from_perpendicular) * Force_at_peroendicular
 
Thank you for replying.

Wouldn't this imply that at 90 degrees to the perpendicular that there is no force required to pull the magnet seeing as cos(90) = 0?

Unless you mean angle_from_perpendicular in radians? But then the resulting force needed is only minutely different. Maybe this is the case? That the force difference between shearing a magnet away from another or pulling perpendicular are roughly the same? It doesn't seem to be so though.

I obviously still need a bit of guidance on this.

Thanks
 
Good point. This is because at 90 degree's the magnetic force is from a different part of the magnet.

Magnetic forces are caused by moving charges (generally electrons) in the plane perpindicular to their travel. A moving charge does not create a magnetic force perpendicular to this, i.e. in its direction of travel.

Now a magnet is like a closed electric circuit, with electrons moving round the outside. If you put the north of the magnet facing upwards the electrons are moving round it in the clockwise direction.

So let's go for a cuboid magnet for my simplicity. I'm going to ignore the N and S end bits. But let's say its a cuboid with faces f1,f2,f3,f4 and areas a1,a2,a3,a4 and such that a1=a3 and a2=a4, i.e. these are opposite faces. Since its a cuboid all these faces will have the same height but different width.

If we know the force when perpindicular to one face (say f1, call this force F) and we want to know it when we move it around angle theta from the perpindicular. It would be:

F*cos(theta)+(a2/a1)*F*sin(theta)

Just to let you know this is just me thinking aloud, I'm always doing magnetic forces from currents or electrons, not bar magnets. A better resource might be:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_between_magnets#Calculating_the_magnetic_force
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K