Q - Double slit experiment, delayed slit selection observation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Double Slit Experiment and the impact of observation on interference patterns. It is established that if a measuring device determines which slit a photon passes through, the wave function collapses, preventing the formation of an interference pattern, regardless of whether a human observes the measurement. The placement of the observation screen relative to the slits is crucial; a screen positioned close to the slits yields which-way information and no interference, while a distant screen allows for the typical Fraunhofer diffraction pattern due to overlapping waves. This phenomenon exemplifies Bohr's principle of complementarity, where only one aspect—particle or wave—can be observed at a time.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly wave-particle duality
  • Familiarity with Huygens's principle in wave theory
  • Knowledge of Fraunhofer diffraction and its implications
  • Basic concepts of wave function collapse in quantum measurement
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of wave function collapse in quantum mechanics
  • Study Huygens's principle in greater detail and its applications in optics
  • Investigate the concept of complementarity as proposed by Niels Bohr
  • Learn about advanced experimental setups in quantum mechanics, including delayed choice experiments
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum physics, educators teaching advanced physics concepts, and anyone interested in the foundational principles of quantum mechanics and wave-particle duality.

Matt711
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
The result of slit selection is shown on a PC monitor, observer does not see the result, is there an interference or particle pattern on a interference screen?
Do I see an interference pattern on a interference screen in Double slit experiment if there is a detector watching which slit photon went trough but the observer does not see the result of detector measurement?
Thanks :]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No
 
BvU said:
No
why not?
 
Why would you expect a diffraction pattern?

:welcome: ##\qquad##!​

##\ ##
 
Matt711 said:
why not?
You have to have some sort of measuring device to determine which slit the particle went through if the PC is going to display that information on its screen. The interaction with that measuring device is an “observation” sufficient to collapse the wave function - it doesn’t matter whether a human being gets involved.

Many older threads here, such as https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...e-of-quantum-measurement.919279/#post-5796193
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and BvU
You don't even need to put something in the slits to have which-way information. It's sufficient to put the screen, where the particles are observed close enough to the double slits. It's easy to understand within the wave picture, why you don't see interference fringes: Due to Huygens's principle the wave behind the slits is given by the superposition of the spherical waves coming from each point in the slit openings. If you are close enough to the slits these spherical waves don't overlap there, and thus they do not interfere at the observation screen and you have which-way information for each particle. If you put the screen far away from the slits you get the usual Fraunhofer diffraction pattern, because the partial waves from the slits overlap at the screen and thus you can't know from which slit each of the individual particle came. In this sense you have a typical case of what Bohr called "complementarity": You can either observe "particle aspects" or "wave aspects" of the "quanta", depending on the choice of observation (in this case putting the observational screen close to or far from the slits. You can't have both aspects in one experiment, but of course you can put the observational screen somewhere in between. Then you have some "uncertain" which-way information and a somewhat "blurred" diffraction pattern.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Heidi

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
55
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K