B Q - Double slit experiment, delayed slit selection observation

Matt711
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
The result of slit selection is shown on a PC monitor, observer does not see the result, is there an interference or particle pattern on a interference screen?
Do I see an interference pattern on a interference screen in Double slit experiment if there is a detector watching which slit photon went trough but the observer does not see the result of detector measurement?
Thanks :]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No
 
BvU said:
No
why not?
 
Why would you expect a diffraction pattern?

:welcome: ##\qquad##!​

##\ ##
 
Matt711 said:
why not?
You have to have some sort of measuring device to determine which slit the particle went through if the PC is going to display that information on its screen. The interaction with that measuring device is an “observation” sufficient to collapse the wave function - it doesn’t matter whether a human being gets involved.

Many older threads here, such as https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...e-of-quantum-measurement.919279/#post-5796193
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and BvU
You don't even need to put something in the slits to have which-way information. It's sufficient to put the screen, where the particles are observed close enough to the double slits. It's easy to understand within the wave picture, why you don't see interference fringes: Due to Huygens's principle the wave behind the slits is given by the superposition of the spherical waves coming from each point in the slit openings. If you are close enough to the slits these spherical waves don't overlap there, and thus they do not interfere at the observation screen and you have which-way information for each particle. If you put the screen far away from the slits you get the usual Fraunhofer diffraction pattern, because the partial waves from the slits overlap at the screen and thus you can't know from which slit each of the individual particle came. In this sense you have a typical case of what Bohr called "complementarity": You can either observe "particle aspects" or "wave aspects" of the "quanta", depending on the choice of observation (in this case putting the observational screen close to or far from the slits. You can't have both aspects in one experiment, but of course you can put the observational screen somewhere in between. Then you have some "uncertain" which-way information and a somewhat "blurred" diffraction pattern.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top