B Q - Double slit experiment, delayed slit selection observation

Click For Summary
In the double slit experiment, the presence of a measuring device that determines which slit a photon passes through collapses the wave function, preventing the formation of an interference pattern, regardless of whether the observer sees the measurement result. The interaction with the measuring device constitutes an observation that eliminates the wave-like behavior of the particles. If the observation screen is placed close to the slits, the spherical waves from each slit do not overlap, resulting in no interference. Conversely, positioning the screen further away allows for overlapping waves, creating a typical diffraction pattern. This illustrates Bohr's principle of complementarity, where one can observe either particle or wave aspects, but not both simultaneously.
Matt711
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
The result of slit selection is shown on a PC monitor, observer does not see the result, is there an interference or particle pattern on a interference screen?
Do I see an interference pattern on a interference screen in Double slit experiment if there is a detector watching which slit photon went trough but the observer does not see the result of detector measurement?
Thanks :]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No
 
BvU said:
No
why not?
 
Why would you expect a diffraction pattern?

:welcome: ##\qquad##!​

##\ ##
 
Matt711 said:
why not?
You have to have some sort of measuring device to determine which slit the particle went through if the PC is going to display that information on its screen. The interaction with that measuring device is an “observation” sufficient to collapse the wave function - it doesn’t matter whether a human being gets involved.

Many older threads here, such as https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...e-of-quantum-measurement.919279/#post-5796193
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and BvU
You don't even need to put something in the slits to have which-way information. It's sufficient to put the screen, where the particles are observed close enough to the double slits. It's easy to understand within the wave picture, why you don't see interference fringes: Due to Huygens's principle the wave behind the slits is given by the superposition of the spherical waves coming from each point in the slit openings. If you are close enough to the slits these spherical waves don't overlap there, and thus they do not interfere at the observation screen and you have which-way information for each particle. If you put the screen far away from the slits you get the usual Fraunhofer diffraction pattern, because the partial waves from the slits overlap at the screen and thus you can't know from which slit each of the individual particle came. In this sense you have a typical case of what Bohr called "complementarity": You can either observe "particle aspects" or "wave aspects" of the "quanta", depending on the choice of observation (in this case putting the observational screen close to or far from the slits. You can't have both aspects in one experiment, but of course you can put the observational screen somewhere in between. Then you have some "uncertain" which-way information and a somewhat "blurred" diffraction pattern.
 
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...