Q: How can I solve a population growth problem using the general equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ksle82
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Growth
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a population growth problem, specifically using the general equation for population growth to determine the time required for a population to triple, given that it doubles in two years. The subject area is mathematical modeling of population dynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the general equation for population growth, questioning whether they are using the correct formula and if the time variable is appropriately defined. Other participants confirm the validity of the equation while suggesting the need to clarify the interpretation of "triple" and the time unit used. There is also a discussion about alternative forms of the equation and simplifications that can be made.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing validation of the original poster's approach and exploring alternative methods. There is a focus on ensuring clarity regarding the definitions and assumptions involved in the problem, but no consensus has been reached on the interpretation of certain terms.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of the time variable and the meaning of tripling the population, as well as the potential for different mathematical representations of the growth equation.

ksle82
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
im trying to solve a population growth problem. not sure if I am using the right eqn. Please check:

Q: if the population doubles in two years, how long does it take to triple?

Solution:

general equation for population growth: N=No*e^(rt)
1) find unknown constant "r" from given
2No=No*e^(rt)
from equation, r= ln(2)/2
2) find "t" for population to triple
3No=No*e^(rt)
solving for t: t=2ln(3)/ln(2) ~ 3.170 years
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If that's the equation your given then yes you are using the right equation. Just verify that t is indeed measured in years rather than some other time scale. Also verify that they imply triple to mean 3No not 3(2No). Even thoughy you used a calculator i think you can still simplify ln(3)/ln(2)
 
neurocomp2003 said:
If that's the equation your given then yes you are using the right equation.
thats the problem I am not sure I am using the right equation.
 
Yes, that's a perfectly valid formula.

However, you could also use
[tex]P(t)= P_0 2^{\frac{t}{2}}[/tex]
(every two years, t/2 is an integer, so we have multiplies by 2 t/2 times.)
then
[tex]P(t)= 3P_0= P_0 2^{\frac{T}{2}[/tex]
[tex]2^{\frac{T}{2}}= 3[/tex]
[tex]\left(\frac{T}{2}\right) log(2)= log(3)[/tex]
[tex]T= \frac{2 log(3)}{ log(2)}[/tex]
as you have.
 
also note that your equation when substituted with your given value of "r" simplies to the equation posted by HallsOfIvy
 
Exactly. All "exponentials" are interchangable. That's why you only need log base 10 and log base e on your calculator.
[tex]2^{\frac{t}{2}}= e^{ln(2^{\frac{t}{2}}= e^\frac{t}{2}ln(2)[/tex]
which is [itex]e^{rt}[/itex] with r= ln(2)/2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K