A statement in a book of analysis I have says:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

(Q,+, .) is a commutative ring with an identity element.

I assume by its notation (Q,+,.) is a tuple.(correct?)

There are several questions that come to mind:

1. Why is there an order between Q,+ and . ?

2. As far as I know, a tuple is an element of a cartesian product of sets. A ring [itex]\subset[/itex] set. So in other words the book says that the tuple (Q,+,.) is a set. How can a tuple be a set? Isn't that like saying that an element is a set?

3. Of what is + an element of? The set of numeral operators? If so, why can't I find it on the web?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# (Q,+, .) is a commutative ring : confusion

Loading...

Similar Threads for commutative ring confusion | Date |
---|---|

I Splitting ring of polynomials - why is this result unfindable? | Feb 11, 2018 |

Valuation ring - can someone explain this ? | Dec 24, 2014 |

Proof that Determinant is Multiplicative for Commutative Rings | Mar 10, 2013 |

Prove the set of integers is a commutative ring with identity | Nov 10, 2012 |

Make a ring commutative | Oct 29, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**