Q: Measured changes in the CMB radiation?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Joe Ciancimino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cmb Radiation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation is a remnant from the early universe that remains unchanged over time. It is characterized by a consistent wavelength that stretches as the universe expands. The discussion centers on the feasibility of measuring year-to-year changes in the average wavelength of the CMB, with the consensus being that even a 1% change would require millions of years to manifest, rendering current instruments insufficient for detecting such minute variations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cosmic microwave background radiation
  • Familiarity with the concept of cosmic expansion
  • Knowledge of wavelength measurement techniques
  • Basic principles of entropy in cosmology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the methods for measuring cosmic microwave background radiation
  • Explore advancements in instruments capable of detecting minute wavelength changes
  • Study the implications of cosmic expansion on wavelength and time measurement
  • Investigate the relationship between entropy and cosmological measurements
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and physics researchers interested in the properties of the cosmic microwave background and the implications of cosmic expansion on measurements of time and entropy.

Joe Ciancimino
Messages
28
Reaction score
6
The cosmic microwave background was a single event that happened literally everywhere in pretty much a single instance. That moment was in the past and is unchanging. What does change is the wavelength of the radiation as it travels through the expanding universe causing the wavelength to grow longer as it passes through expanding space.

My question is this. Can we measure any year to year change in the average wavelength of the CMB? My thinking being, the CMB is the same distance from the observer at any single point in the universe. If such a change could be measured, could that not be used as a Newtonian clock? That is to say, rather than using time as the primary unit of measurement for the age of the universe post CMB to instead use a measurement entropy which would not be effected Lorentz changes due to gravity? (Or at least marginally effected, to which the difference could be ignored in most cases.)
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Joe Ciancimino said:
My question is this. Can we measure any year to year change in the average wavelength of the CMB?

I don't think so. Even a 1% change to the wavelength takes something on the order of a million of years if I remember correctly. I'm not sure our instruments are sensitive enough to detect a change so small.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
6K