How Does a CMB Photon Travel Through Expanding Universe?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the journey of a cosmic microwave background (CMB) photon through an expanding universe, exploring the implications of the Big Bang model on its travel distance and time. Participants examine the relationship between the emission distance, the expansion of space, and the proper distance of the photon as a function of cosmological time.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the photon began its journey at a distance of 42 million light years (Mly) when the universe was approximately 0.38 million years old, but the actual distance it traveled to reach us is about 13.8 billion light years (Gly) due to the expansion of space.
  • Others argue that while the photon started at 42 Mly, the expanding universe means that the distance to the point of emission has increased over time, complicating the description of its journey.
  • Participants discuss the need to plot the proper distance of the photon over time, suggesting that mathematical models and cosmological calculators can be used to illustrate this relationship.
  • One participant presents a mathematical expression for the proper distance in a matter-dominated universe, indicating that the proper distance may initially grow but could eventually decrease depending on the parameters involved.
  • Some participants express concern that not everyone may have the mathematical background to engage with the technical aspects of the discussion, suggesting the use of calculators to produce visual representations of the data.
  • There is a suggestion to clarify the concept of a light cone and its relevance to the journey of the photon, with some participants cautioning against using terms like "turning around" to describe the photon's path.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the significance of the expansion of space in understanding the journey of the CMB photon, but multiple competing views remain regarding the interpretation of its travel distance and the implications of the mathematical models discussed. The discussion remains unresolved on certain technical aspects and interpretations.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific cosmological models and assumptions about the universe's expansion. The discussion also highlights the complexity of relating mathematical expressions to physical interpretations of the photon's journey.

  • #31
JimJCW said:
What I am saying is that the bow-shaped d vs. time plot is different from a bow-shaped x-position vs. y-position plot.

What bow-shaped x-position vs. y-position plot are you talking about?
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #32
PeterDonis said:
What bow-shaped x-position vs. y-position plot are you talking about?
Good luck!
 
  • #33
PeterDonis said:
What bow-shaped x-position vs. y-position plot are you talking about?

Or, for that matter, what non bow-shaped x-position vs. y-position plot are you talking about? So far I have not seen any x-position vs. y-position plot described or referenced at all in this thread.
 
  • #34
PeterDonis said:
What bow-shaped x-position vs. y-position plot are you talking about?
I was referring to the comment made by PeroK (in #19):

If you change your coordinates, you'll get a linear graph if you want one. There is no physical significance in a graph like that. It certainly doesn't, in any meaningful way, represent light traveling on a "bow shaped" path.​
 
  • #35
JimJCW said:
I was referring to the comment made by PeroK (in #19):

Nothing in that comment is about a graph of x-position vs. y-position. So I still don't know what you are referring to.
 
  • #36
PeterDonis said:
Nothing in that comment is about a graph of x-position vs. y-position. So I still don't know what you are referring to.

PeroK mentioned,

It certainly doesn't, in any meaningful way, represent light traveling on a "bow shaped" path.​

I assumed he meant something like path in Euclidean space such as x vs. y plots. I tried to explain that we are not dealing with that kind of paths in our case.
 
  • #37
JimJCW said:
PeroK mentioned,

It certainly doesn't, in any meaningful way, represent light traveling on a "bow shaped" path.​

I assumed he meant something like path in Euclidean space such as x vs. y plots. I tried to explain that we are not dealing with that kind of paths in our case.
Don't blame me!
 
  • #38
PeroK said:
Don't blame me!
I am sorry. I didn't mean it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #39
JimJCW said:
I am sorry. I didn't mean it.
Only joking!
 
  • #40
Bandersnatch said:
The bow (or teardrop) shape arises naturally if the space expands while the photon travels - as you understand, it's that being carried away by expansion before approaching. But since it is still the path of a photon through space-time, it's still a light cone. Even if doesn't look terribly conical in those coordinates.
Let me summarize how we get here. If we fix our telescope at a given direction in space, we will see photons from various sources with various redshift values. The output of Jorrie’s calculator gives us the proper distances, D(then)’s, and the emission times, Cosmological Times, of these observed photons. It took me some effort and reflections to make the connection between the journey of a single photon to these D(then)’s and Cosmological Times. However, this connection seems obvious to you based on your knowledge of spacetime and light cones. That’s the capability I wish to have. It is hard for me; it’s like another language requiring a lot of learning. Use the words of Hermann Minkowski, Einstein's professor at Zurich Polytechnic:

"The views of space and time which I wish to lay before you have sprung from the soil of experimental physics, and therein lies their strength. They are radical. Henceforth space by itself, and time by itself, are doomed to fade away into mere shadows, and only a kind of union of the two will preserve an independent reality."​

I copied this from an online article, Minkowski's Four-Dimensional Space-Time, https://einsteinrelativelyeasy.com/...ativity/11-introduction-to-spacetime-diagrams

I study cosmology on my own and find cosmological calculators such as those by Jorrie and Gnedin to be very helpful in learning the ΛCDM model.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bandersnatch

Similar threads

  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
12K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K