QED could precisely predict the magnetic moment of electron

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) can accurately predict the magnetic moments of the electron and muon due to its simpler calculations and the small coupling constant, allowing for reliable perturbation series. In contrast, the lifetime of the neutron cannot be predicted with the same accuracy because it is governed by Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) and the complexities of the strong force. The muon's decay, mediated by the weak force, falls under electroweak theory, which is inherently more complicated than QED. The challenges in calculating weak interactions arise from the massive propagator and axial nature of the processes involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Electrodynamics (QED)
  • Familiarity with Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD)
  • Knowledge of weak interactions and electroweak theory
  • Basic proficiency in Feynman diagram calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) in detail
  • Explore Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) and its implications for particle physics
  • Investigate the electroweak theory and its role in particle decay processes
  • Learn advanced techniques for calculating Feynman diagrams in weak interactions
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, graduate students in particle physics, and researchers interested in the intricacies of quantum field theories and particle decay mechanisms.

vincentchan
Messages
609
Reaction score
0
I have a little question about QED..
How come QED could precisely predict the magnetic moment of electron and muon, but can't predict the lifetime of neutron with the same accuracy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the strong force holds the neutron together, the strong force is described by QCD.
 
how about the life time of muon, can QED predict the lifetime of muon with a high accuracy?
 
vincentchan said:
how about the life time of muon, can QED predict the lifetime of muon with a high accuracy?
Actually the decay of the muon is mediated by weak force (this can be seen by the large lifetime of the muon). So electroweak theory would govern this decay, not plain QED.
Cheers,
Ryan
 
Yes,both neutron & muon decay are weak processes.Incidentaly,they're both wonderfully treated in [1].And in the same chapter,i.e.chapter 10.

Daniel.

--------------------------------------------------------------
[1]David J.Griffiths,"Introduction to Elementary Particles",Harper & Row,1987.
 
So, Do we fully understand the weak interection?
I mean, if we understand weak interaction, we should able to predict the lifetime of muon, right?
But it seems like weak interaction is not as good as QED... can anyone tell me why...?
 
They're both good.It's just that the calculations involved in QED are much simpler.

Daniel.
 
Fundamentally the weak interaction is harder to calculate (even with a computer), b/c the coupling constant for QED is so small it allows many orders of perturbation series to reliably be calculated, before asymptotic renormalon behaviour starts corrupting your data. The Fermi coupling being larger doesn't give you that reliability.

Of course there are other issues in the calculational difficulty, some of which are based on the accuracy of experiment, and some technicalities in the weak sector that are quite challenging. First of all the propagator is massive, which adds extra stuff to the calculation, second of all the process is now distinctively axial in nature. Essentially this makes drawing feynmann diagrams for V-A interactions an enormous chore, best left for grad students =)

(note I am pulling an all niter grading papers, so forgive the brevity and conceptual mistakes I am likely making)

(incidentally I hate the weak interaction. I find it remarkably unbeautiful compared to QED or QCD. I also hated attending conferences with the electro weak experamentalists, as invariably some bayesian statistics debate would rear its ugly head and everything would degenerate)
 
Last edited:
Yes,both neutron & muon decay are weak processes.

Yes, of course. :redface: I never meant to imply anything else by my post.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
568
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K