QFT Commutator for spacelike separation

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
Messages
29,786
Reaction score
21,592
Homework Statement
Show that the commutator for field operators is zero for spacelike separations
Relevant Equations
$$\hat \phi(x) = \int \frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^{3/2}(2E_p)^{1/2}}(\hat{a}_{\vec p}exp(-ip\cdot x)+\hat{a}^{\dagger}_{\vec p}exp(ip\cdot x))$$
I got as far as:
$$[\hat \phi(x), \hat \phi(y) ] = \int \frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^{3}(2E_p)}(\exp(-ip.(x-y) - \exp(-ip.(y-x))$$
Then I simplified the problem by taking one of the four-vectors to be the origin:
$$[\hat \phi(0), \hat \phi(y) ] = \int \frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^{3}(2E_p)}(\exp(ip.y) - \exp(-ip.y))$$
We need to show that this is zero for spacelike ##y##. But, I can't see how the spacelike condition is relevant. The hint in the book is that we can change ##-y## to ##y## in the second term. If ##p## was a three-vector I can see this, but the zeroth component of ##p## is the positive ##E_p##. And, if it's a simple ##p## substitution, then that should work for any ##y##, spacelike or otherwise.

Any help would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JD_PM
Physics news on Phys.org
I might have a solution. Assuming this whole theory is Lorentz invariant, then we could choose coordinates so that ##x## and ##y## are simultaneous. The zeroth term disappears from the inner product and the result follows.

I guess that's the trick.
 
Hint: You don't have to assume that the theory is Lorentz invariant, because the integral for sure is, because ##\mathrm{d}^3 p/E_p## is invariant, and ##y \cdot p## is too. That's why the integral is a scalar field operator. Now you can choose ##y## (given that it is space) in the most simple way to evaluate this function. Note that since you only have the four-vector ##y## available it's clear that the expression must be a function of ##y^2=y \cdot y## only!