QFT interpretation of Hawking Radiation

AdvaitDhingra
Messages
51
Reaction score
22
Hello,

So I was reading about Hawking radiation and I read a QFT interpretation of it. It went something like this:

A vacuum contains virtual particles (vacuum energy), which in qft can be described as waves that are out of phase and cancel each other out (matter and antimatter). I a black hole, this out-of-phase state is disturbed and the waves do not cancel each other out, thereby converting virtual particles into particles that seem to originate from the Black Hole.

My question is, how does a Black Hole merely "disturb" the waves of the field and not simply suck them in? I mean, isn't that what Black Holes do? Here is an image of what I'm talking about from a video by PBS Space Time:

(I'm 15 by the way, so please tell me if there are flaws in my explanation)
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot from 2021-04-30 11-38-17.png
    Screenshot from 2021-04-30 11-38-17.png
    39.8 KB · Views: 270
Physics news on Phys.org
AdvaitDhingra said:
So I was reading about Hawking radiation and...
Reading where? You will get much better answers if we know what you've been reading.

There may not be any simple answer to your question. You can find Hawking's paper here and there is a somewhat more friendly explanation here.
 
  • Like
Likes AdvaitDhingra
  • Like
Likes AdvaitDhingra
Based on the thermal interpretation, I developed a quantum version of the classical, mechanical universe suggested by Laplace over 200 years ago. Abstract. The purpose of this paper is to propose a quantum version of the classical, mechanical universe suggested by Laplace over 200 years ago. The proposed theory operates fully within the established mathematical formalism of quantum field theory. The proposed theory unifies the classical and quantum intuition about the macroscopic and...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
564
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K
Replies
14
Views
3K