A QFT Superposition of Final States

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter masteralien
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
In quantum field theory (QFT), the scattering amplitude represents the overlap between initial and final states during interactions, such as electron-electron scattering. However, systems may evolve into superpositions of final states, as seen in processes like Compton scattering or electron-positron interactions, where multiple outcomes are possible. To compute scattering amplitudes in these scenarios, one would sum the contributions from each possible final state, leading to a combined S Matrix. The discussion also highlights that different outcomes often belong to separate superselection sectors, complicating the notion of superpositions. Ultimately, the evolution of the initial quantum state depends on the specific interaction dynamics, raising questions about the nature of superpositions in these contexts.
masteralien
Messages
36
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
In QFT one computes Scattering Amplitudes between Initial and Final States however sometimes the system doesn’t evolve into a single final state but a superposition how does one compute the S Matrix or Green Functions for this case.
In QFT one important calculation is the Scattering amplitude the overlap between an initial state and a final state due to an interaction. For example the S Matrix element for electron electron scattering is the overlap between an initial 2 electron state in the far past and a 2 electron state in the far future.

However the system may not evolve into a single final state rather a superposition. For example during Compton Scattering a recoiling electron may also emit photons due to Bremsstrahlung or during an electron positron interaction the final state could either be a photon or an electron and a positron either Bhabha Scattering or Pair Annihilation can happen. How would one compute scattering amplitudes and Correlation Functions in this case when there is more than a single final state.

Presumably one would simply add up the amplitudes for electron positron interaction as

S_fi=S1+S2

And Green Functions as the sum of the 2 possibilities
G=G4(x1,x2,x3,x4)+G3(x5,x3,x4)
=<Ω|Tψ(x1)ψ(x2)ψ^+(x3)ψ^+(x4)|Ω>+<Ω|TA_μ(x5)ψ^+(x3)ψ^+(x4)|Ω>

Where x3 and x4 are the initial spacetime positions of the electron and positron x1 and x2 final spacetime positions and x5 the Photon’s spacetime position.

Presumably it would follow the S Matrix is simply a sum of the 2.

Disclaimer the electron positron scattering was an example there might be more than 2 possible final states this was simply an example
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As far as I understand it, almost all different outcomes are in separate superselection sectors (differing by an infinite number of soft photons) so that no superpositions are possible.
 
DrDu said:
As far as I understand it, almost all different outcomes are in separate superselection sectors (differing by an infinite number of soft photons) so that no superpositions are possible.
But when you have an electron and positron collide they can either annihilate or scatter which one happens then. How would this initial quantum state evolve if its not in a superposition and could you elaborate a bit more on why superpositions are not possible.
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...