QG Light Time Arrivals & Swiss Cheese Effect

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the potential impact of large-scale cosmic structures, specifically voids, on Quantum Gravity (QG) light time arrivals. Participants express skepticism regarding the energy-dependent delays reported by the MAGIC collaboration, emphasizing the need for consistent observations across multiple gamma-ray flares to validate these findings. The Swiss Cheese Effect is mentioned, suggesting that it may not significantly affect the overall travel time of gamma-ray bursts. The upcoming launch of the GLAST satellite in February 2008 is anticipated to provide further insights into this phenomenon.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Gravity concepts
  • Familiarity with gamma-ray astronomy
  • Knowledge of the Swiss Cheese Effect in cosmology
  • Awareness of the GLAST satellite mission and its objectives
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of large-scale cosmic structures on light propagation
  • Study the MAGIC collaboration's findings on energy-dependent delays in gamma-ray emissions
  • Explore the Swiss Cheese Effect and its relevance to cosmological observations
  • Follow updates on the GLAST satellite mission and its contributions to gamma-ray astronomy
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and researchers interested in the effects of cosmic structures on light travel, as well as those studying gamma-ray emissions and the implications of Quantum Gravity theories.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,411
Reaction score
551
Will this muddy QG light time arrivals?
 
Space news on Phys.org
wolram said:
Will this muddy QG light time arrivals?

Wolram, your intuition seems correct to me. the large scale structure has these big voids in it and that should influence travel time, not necessarily in any way dependent on energy however

I should admit that after the MAGIC collaboration reported that ONE incident where they had observed a delay that depended on ENERGY there was a strong skeptical reaction on the part of a lot of people---on blogs and I imagine elsewhere too.
A lot of people are taking the position that they are going to have to see quite a number of gammaray flares analyzed, and the same energy-dependent delay found in each one, before they will believe it's real.

I can sympathise with this. So for now I will try carefully not to suggest that the delay is real---it could be just a random thing in the data or some effect at the source.

I would expect that the swiss cheese will not interfere too much because the whole flare or the whole burst would be affected by voids equally if at all---low and high energy alike.

but the whole thing will just have to be forgotten if it is not repeatedly observed.
GLAST should help. It has been delayed so often that I dread further delays---but barring such troubles it is scheduled to be launched February 2008.
http://www.nasa.gov/missions/highlights/schedule.html
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
7K