QGravity, masses and CKM matrix all for free

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter arivero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    ckm ckm matrix Matrix
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the postulation of an undeterminacy principle for General Relativity (GR) that involves transforming to Minkowskian coordinates, which leads to an inability to determine the infinitesimal volume of transformation up to the Planck constant. The author introduces a momentum formulation using separate mass values for each coordinate, specifically for the electron, up, and down quarks. The discussion also touches on the construction of the Riemann tensor and the introduction of the CKM matrix to manage ambiguities in derivatives due to indeterminacy. Relevant references include works on quantization ambiguities and spectral triples.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity (GR) principles
  • Familiarity with Minkowskian coordinates
  • Knowledge of the CKM matrix in particle physics
  • Basic concepts of momentum and mass in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the undeterminacy principle in General Relativity
  • Explore the role of the CKM matrix in particle physics
  • Study the construction and properties of the Riemann tensor
  • Investigate the Kaluza-Klein theory and its interpretations of mass
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in theoretical physics, quantum mechanics, and General Relativity, as well as researchers interested in the intersection of particle physics and mathematical frameworks.

arivero
Gold Member
Messages
3,481
Reaction score
187
I'd like to know if someone has seen/read, at least in part, some of this rumbling anywhere (beyond my own speculations, this is). It should be nice to know if it coincides with some other "speculator".

Postulate an undeterminacy principle for GR:
when transforming locally to minkowskian coordinates, you can not determine, up to plank constant, the infinitesimal volume where the transformation applies.

Now, such infinitesim is given by a generic coordinate vector x and a infinitesimal displacement (dx0, dx1, dx2, dx3). From this displacement you can get a velocity vector (1,dx1/dx0,dx2/dx0,dx3/dx0). To get units of momenta, one multiplies it by a mass. ¿Plank mass? ¡No! you can -and you will- use a separate mass value for each coordinate: m_n, m_e, m_u, m_d.

In this way you have got a momentum (m_e dx1/dx0, m_u dx1/dx0. m_d dx3/dx0) for the infinitesimal volume, and now you are can impose the condition [x,p]=h. Note that m_n=0 at this order.

Now one must build the riemann tensor. but this procedure involves first and second derivatives of metric. Regretly (well, not) the left and right derivatives do not coincide anymore because the indeterminacy does not let us to take the zero limit in derivatives. Thus we will introduce a matrix to control the ambiguity process in each derivation. This will be the CKM matrix.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I was trying to exploit https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.522810 ambiguities.

In my arxive I can see at least a related note https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0007027

At that time at was unaware of Kaluza Klein interpretation of mass, so I was looking for something without extra dimensions, and then I though about ambiguities in quantization. I was expecting to be able to formalise them via the tangent groupoid, and then perhaps to connect with Connes-Lott-Chamseddine spectral triples. Ambitious, it was.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt
https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9905021 was another in this topic, and surely most of my early notes from years 96 to 2000, they are just light scraps as at that time I was already outside the academy, working in computer science as a lot of my kin.
 

Similar threads

Graduate Koide Mass Formula for Neutrinos
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
27K