QM time independent perturbation theory

  • Thread starter Thread starter Marco99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics Quantum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of time-independent perturbation theory to analyze degenerate energy levels in quantum mechanics, specifically for the case of three degenerate energy levels with quantum numbers |l=1, l_{z}=0, +1, -1| and spin states |s=1/2, s_{z}=-1/2>. The user successfully diagonalizes the H' matrix in the unperturbed state basis but encounters confusion regarding the interpretation of the perturbed eigenstates. The key issue arises from the orthonormality of the |j, j_{z}> states, leading to the realization that the unperturbed states |n_0> and |n_1> do not correspond to the expected perturbed eigenstates, prompting a need for clarification on the perturbation term H' as a function of angular momentum and spin.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically perturbation theory
  • Familiarity with angular momentum quantum numbers (l, l_{z})
  • Knowledge of spin states and their representation in quantum mechanics
  • Ability to work with matrix diagonalization in quantum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of time-independent perturbation theory in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the representation of angular momentum and spin in quantum states
  • Investigate the implications of degenerate perturbation theory on energy levels
  • Explore the mathematical formulation of the perturbation term H' as H' = (const.) * L · S
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, graduate students in physics, and researchers working on quantum mechanics and perturbation theory applications.

Marco99
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Hello everyone,
So I have a QM assignment in which I have a s=1/2 particle with an unperturbed hamiltonian H diagonal in the |l,l_{z}>|s, s_{z}> base of the form H = A*L^2 + B*S_{z} (with 0 < B << A), and a perturbation term H' of the form H'=const * < L | S >, which can be shown to be diagonal in the |l, s; j, j_{z}> base. I am asked to calculate the energy corrections for the three lowest energy levels in the presence of the perturbation, and I applied time independent perturbation theory.
Relevant Equations
None
The lowest two energy level corrections (l=0, s_{z}=-1/2 and l=0, s_{z}=1/2) are easy to work out since the eigenvalues are not degenerate and the unperturbed energy levels also happen to be eigenstates of H'.

However I have three degenerate energy levels for the third eigenvalue of the form |l=1, l_{z}=0, +1, -1>|s=1/2, s_{z}=-1/2>. The l_{z}=-1 case is trivial, since it corresponds to the |l=1, s=1/2; j=3/2, j_{z}=-3/2> state, which is also an eigenstate of H'.

The l_{z}=0 and l_{z}=1 case is less trivial, so I used time independent perturbation theory in the degenerate case to diagonalise the H' matrix in the unperturbed state base |l=1, l_{z}=0, +1>|s=1/2, s_{z}=-1/2>.

The thing is in this base H' is already represented by a diagonal matrix since, calling |n_0}> and |n_1}> the two unperturbed states with l_{z}=0 and l_{z}=1 and expressing these in the |j, j_{z}> base, it happens that the off-diagonal terms <n_0 | H' | n_1> = <n_1 | H' |n_0> = 0, because |j, j_{z}> states with different j_{z} values are orthonormal.

Which means that the unperturbed states |n_0> and |n_1> already correspond to the perturbed eigenstates, which makes no sense since these two are not H' eigenstates at all. What am I missing?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I do not understand the perturbation "H'=const * < L | S >". Did you mean $$H'=\text{(const.)}~ \mathbf L\cdot \mathbf S~~?$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K