Graduate Qn on photon statistics (second order correlation function)

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the second order coherence function G2(τ), particularly G2(0), and its implications for laser classification and behavior. It explores the significance of the Siegert relation, questioning how G2(0) can exceed 2 and what this means for practical lasers, which are never truly monochromatic. The conversation also addresses how the coherence properties of laser pulses differ from continuous wave (CW) lasers, suggesting that G2(0) cannot equal 1 for pulsed lasers. Participants seek clarity on the physical meaning of G2(0) in various contexts, including chaotic light sources and practical laser applications. Overall, the thread emphasizes the need for a deeper understanding of coherence in quantum optics.
Tainty
Messages
27
Reaction score
1
I am trying to better understand the concept of second order coherence G2(τ) (in particular G2(0)) and a few questions have arisen. Note that I am trying to get a physical idea of what is happening so I would appreciate it if your responses can keep the math to the minimum possible. :)

How do we physically think of the Siegert relation / chaotic field limit, i.e. G2(0) = 2 when it seems like the value of G2(0) can actually lie between 1 and infinity? Or a perhaps a better way of phrasing this is - what does it physically mean to say that G2(0) > 2?

In relation to qn 1, how should one attempt to classify a laser in the laboratory? Since a laser in practice can never be truly monochromatic, does that automatically imply that 1<G2(0)<=2 for a practical laser? Does the upper bound (chaotic field limit) apply for a practical laser? Is it correct to include this upper bound and model a practical laser as a quasi-chaotic light source with a corresponding (longer than most thermal light sources) coherence time?

Most of these ideas seem to be centered upon the condition of continuous intensity, i.e. the analogue of a CW laser, or at least to me, they are better understood when considered in such a manner. My final and real question is: how does the physical meaning and definition of G2(0) and G2(τ) change when we think of a laser pulse?

Obviously the idea of a laser pulse implicitly means that such light is no longer monochromatic so it follows that G2(0) cannot be = 1? Beyond that, i have trouble moving further.

Please help me out.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Paul Colby
Physics news on Phys.org
Tainty said:
Please help me out.
I think you should provide context by giving a reference.
 
Sorry for the lack of clarity in my post.
I have been referring mostly to online material as well as Rodney Loudon's "Quantum Theory of Light" which I have had trouble understanding mostly due to my own lack of knowledge in quantum optics. I have found this online response particularly helpful.
http://physics.stackexchange.com/qu...ify-in-quantum-optics-and-how-to-calculate-it
And the same for this wiki article
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degree_of_coherence
However, the questions in my initial post are new questions that have surfaced after reading the above articles.

The second order correlation function G2(τ) is defined here as = <I(t)*I(t+τ)>/<I(t)>2 where I denotes intensity and the angled brackets refer to time averaged quantities.
(The Siegert relation says that G2(τ) = 1 + |G1(τ)|2 where G1(τ) is the first order correlation function.)
 
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 178 ·
6
Replies
178
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
128
Views
34K