Quadratic - Completing the square

  • Thread starter Thread starter thomas49th
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quadratic Square
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving quadratic equations, specifically focusing on the equation 2x² + 5x + 3 = 0 and a related polynomial equation x^{5} - 4x^{3} = 455. Participants explore methods such as factoring and completing the square.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to solve the quadratic equation by factoring and expresses uncertainty about the correctness of their answers. They also seek guidance on solving the polynomial equation to two decimal places.
  • Some participants question the original poster's approach to the polynomial equation, suggesting that factorization may not be appropriate for finding approximate roots.
  • Others suggest reconsidering the method of completing the square for the quadratic equation and provide a detailed explanation of that process.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing various methods and hints. There is a recognition of the need for clarification on the second problem, and some guidance has been offered regarding the appropriate methods to apply.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of different equations and methods, with some confusion regarding the application of factorization to the polynomial equation. The original poster's attempts and the responses indicate a mix of understanding and uncertainty about the correct approaches.

thomas49th
Messages
645
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Need to solve
2x² + 5x + 3 = 0

Homework Equations



at² + bt + c = 0
so a = 2, b = 5, c = 3

The Attempt at a Solution



a x c = 6
a + c = 5
so ned to find somthing that times to make 6 and add to make 5. That is 2, 3

2x² + 2x + 3x + 3

2x (x + 1) + 3(x + 1)

(2x + 3)(x + 1) = 0
so x is either

x = 3/2 = -1.5 or x = -1

Are those answers correct?

If so how would I go about solving this question

A solution to the equation [tex]x^{5} - 4x^{3} = 455[/tex] lies between x = 3.6 and x = 3.8. Find the solution to 2 decimal places.

So should change it = 0 by -455 so i get

[tex]x^{5} - 4x^{3} -455 = 0[/tex]

now where do i go?

Thx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answers are correct. However, your thread title says "completing the square" - you've solved by factoring (which is easier for this particular problem.
Personally, I teach completing the square this way:
2x^2 + 5x + 3 = 0
Get rid of the 3; it's just in the way.
2x^2 + 5x = -3
now factor out any coefficients on the x^2.
2(x^2 + 5/2x ) = -3
Then, add (inside the parenthesis) half of the middle term squared.
Since you have to add the same amount to both sides, add to the right side as well; note: whatever you add inside the parenthesis will be multiplied by 2. Thus:
2(x^2 +5/2 x + 25/16)= -3 + 25/8
Factor (it'll always be half the middle term again)
2(x+5/4)^2 = 1/8
divide by 2
(x+5/4)^2 = 1/16
take the +/- square root
x+5/4 = +/- 1/4
subtract 5/4, and you have your same answers.

For your second problem, there are several ways to solve it, to get it correct to 2 decimal places... what methods have you learned? Show me how you would apply one of those methods and I or someone else can show you where you're making a mistake (or let you know if you're on the right track.)
 
[tex]x^{5} - 4x^{3} -455 = 0[/tex]
[tex]x^{5} - 4x^{3} -455 =(x^{2} - 4x)^{3} - 64 - 455[/tex]

is that right?
 
I have no idea what you are doing. But (x2)3 is x6 not x5 so that can't be right!
 
I think I've got it

x³(x²-4) can be factorised even fruther to
x³(x+2)(x-2)

that means the equation can be x = -2, x = 2 or x=0
 
thomas49th said:
I think I've got it

x³(x²-4) can be factorised even further to
x³(x+2)(x-2)

that means the equation can be x = -2, x = 2 or x=0

This would be true if the equation was [tex]x^{5} - 4x^{3} = 0[/tex], but your equation is [tex]x^{5} - 4x^{3} = 455[/tex]. Since you're looking for an approximate value of the roots, you are not looking to solve this by factorisation.

drpizza hints at this in post #2.
drpizza said:
For your second problem, there are several ways to solve it, to get it correct to 2 decimal places... what methods have you learned? Show me how you would apply one of those methods and I or someone else can show you where you're making a mistake (or let you know if you're on the right track.)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K