A Quantifying nonlinearity from data

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter BillKet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Data
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around extracting the non-linear component, f(x), from a function defined as y = ax + b + f(x), where f(x) is significantly smaller than ax and b. The user seeks a method to quantify deviations from linearity using only measured values of x and y. It is suggested to perform linear regression to determine the linear parameters a and b, then analyze the residuals (y - ax - b) to model the non-linearity. Visualizing the data through plotting could also aid in hypothesizing the form of f(x). Ultimately, the focus is on understanding non-linearity rather than the specific values of a and b.
BillKet
Messages
311
Reaction score
30
Hello! I have a function of the form:

$$y = ax + b + f(x)$$
and I can measure experimentally only x and y. I also know that ##f(x)<<ax,b##, where ##f(x)## is some non-linearity in x i.e. it can't be absorbed into the ##ax+b## part (for example ##f(x) = cx^2##), but I don't know its form. Is there a way to extract ##f(x)##, by measuring only ##x## and ##y##? I am basically wondering if I can quantify the deviation of the expression above from linearity and connect that to the value of x. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As a first pass, you could be in a lot of trouble if ##f(x)=x^2+2x+1=(x+1)^2##, which is going to be literally indistinguishable from adding 2 to a, 1 to b, and ##f(x)=x^2##.

That said, it sounds like maybe you don't care, and you are happy to just think of ##f(x)## as ##x^2## in this case. Is that right?
 
Office_Shredder said:
As a first pass, you could be in a lot of trouble if ##f(x)=x^2+2x+1=(x+1)^2##, which is going to be literally indistinguishable from adding 2 to a, 1 to b, and ##f(x)=x^2##.

That said, it sounds like maybe you don't care, and you are happy to just think of ##f(x)## as ##x^2## in this case. Is that right?
Yes! I am fine with redefining a and b if needed (i.e. absorbing those terms you mentioned above). I am purely interested in any deviation from linearity, regardless of the actual value of a and b.
 
And the thing you care about specifically is trying to estimate y given a value of x? Are we assuming your measurements are perfect with no noise?

I think you would start with doing linear regression to get ##y \approx ax+b## for some ##a## and ##b##. Then compute ##y-ax-b##, and attempt to model it with your favorite parameterized function. If you have a specific example, just drawing a plot of that would probably be a good start for guessing the shape of the non linear piece
 
I was reading a Bachelor thesis on Peano Arithmetic (PA). PA has the following axioms (not including the induction schema): $$\begin{align} & (A1) ~~~~ \forall x \neg (x + 1 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A2) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + 1 =y + 1 \to x = y) \nonumber \\ & (A3) ~~~~ \forall x (x + 0 = x) \nonumber \\ & (A4) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + (y +1) = (x + y ) + 1) \nonumber \\ & (A5) ~~~~ \forall x (x \cdot 0 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A6) ~~~~ \forall xy (x \cdot (y + 1) = (x \cdot y) + x) \nonumber...
I'm taking a look at intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL). Basically it exclude Double Negation Elimination (DNE) from the set of axiom schemas replacing it with Ex falso quodlibet: ⊥ → p for any proposition p (including both atomic and composite propositions). In IPL, for instance, the Law of Excluded Middle (LEM) p ∨ ¬p is no longer a theorem. My question: aside from the logic formal perspective, is IPL supposed to model/address some specific "kind of world" ? Thanks.
Back
Top