Quantum Chaos, Level spacing distr. in integrable system

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the level spacing distribution in quantum chaos, particularly in a 1D spin 1/2 chain. It highlights that integrable systems exhibit Poissonian distributions due to uncorrelated energy levels, while chaotic systems show level repulsion with a Wigner-Dyson distribution. However, the author notes that simple systems like the infinite square well and harmonic oscillator do not conform to this expectation, producing unexpected distributions. The conversation suggests these systems may be exceptions, indicating a need for a refined definition of "generic" in the context of the conjecture. Further research is encouraged to explore more precise formulations of the Poisson distribution in quantum systems.
Scipio
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

For an undergraduate essay, I am studying the development of quantum chaos in a 1D spin 1/2 chain (my main source paper can be found here:http://scitation.aip.org/content/aapt/journal/ajp/80/3/10.1119/1.3671068).

One of the main tools used to distinguish chaotic from non chaotic systems is the level spacing distribution. According to this paper and all other sources I have read, including wikipedia, "the energy levels of integrable systems or not correlated, and are not prohibited from crossing, so the distribution is Poissonian" (ie. negative exponential), "In chaotic systems the eigenvalues become correlated and crossings are avoided. There is level repulsion, and the level spacing distribution is given by the Wigner Dyson distribution", which is similar to the distribution obtained with the spectra of random matrices.

However, many simple systems (infinite square well, harmonic oscillator) have clearly defined functions for the eigenenergies (~n^2, ~n, respectively). If you calculate the spacing between these states and create a histogram out of these, you don't get anything like a Poissonian distribution (for the harmonic oscillator, the distance between all levels are, of course, equal, so the histogram is not very interesting; for the infinite square well, I obtain a completely homogeneous distribution for the spacing of the first 100 eigenvalues, using E[n] = n^2 and a bin width of 10). The first simple system where I obtain the Poissonian distribution is a particle in a box. Are these other simple systems just exceptions to the rule? Is there some intuitive argument to see why?

Thank you!

Ps. cross posted with http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/151042/quantum-chaos-level-spacing-distribution-in-integrable-quantum-systems
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited:
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 79 ·
3
Replies
79
Views
19K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K