Quantum decoherence and the emergence of space/time and gravity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of quantum decoherence, the emergence of continuous space/time, and gravity from quantum scales. Participants explore the relationship between quantum mechanics and gravitational effects, as well as the theoretical implications of these ideas in the context of current research.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that continuous time/space is not an inherent property of the smallest quantum scale, suggesting that these properties emerge from quantum phenomena.
  • Others emphasize the lack of a confirmed theory of quantum gravity, noting that various hypotheses are still under investigation.
  • A question is raised about whether large-scale gravitational effects have been observed in quantum particles, with responses indicating that individual particles are too small for such effects to be measurable.
  • Some participants discuss preliminary experiments involving quantum particles in gravitational fields, noting that while interesting, they do not directly address the emergence of gravity at the quantum level.
  • There are mentions of specific experiments regarding the behavior of anti-particles and neutrons in gravitational fields, highlighting the challenges of achieving accurate measurements.
  • References to recent research and papers, such as those by Sean Carroll, are provided as potential resources for further exploration of the topic.
  • The relationship between quantum entanglement and the emergence of time is brought up, with some participants expressing belief in recent research supporting this connection.
  • Discussion touches on the limitations of current quantum field theories in relation to spacetime structures and the challenges of quantizing spacetime itself.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the emergence of space/time and gravity from quantum mechanics, with no consensus reached on the specifics of these relationships or the implications of current research.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the theoretical limits and experimental challenges in observing gravitational effects at quantum scales. There are unresolved questions regarding the continuity of spacetime at the smallest scales and the nature of time's emergence from quantum entanglement.

shunyadragonvv
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Quantum decoherence. and the emergence of continuous space/time and gravity

Does continuous space/time occur in Quantum smallest scale?
Quantum decoherence. and the emergence of continuous space/time and gravity

In another forum I have experienced a lot of combative dialogue asserting that continuous time/space is a property of the smallest Quantum scale. My present knowledge indicates this not true, and that the goal of the current research is determine how the properties of continuous time/space and gravity emerge from the Quantum smallest scale. I would like some feed back on this issue.

I realize this is a controversial subject as to how the emergence of time/space and gravity happen, but I did not believe that the concept of decoherence and that the large scale properties of continuous time/space were emergent properties of the Quantum smallest scale is controversial.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We don't have a confirmed theory of quantum gravity, so we have no way of answering your question. All we have are various theoretical hypotheses that are being pursued with ongoing research.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff, vanhees71 and Dale
The question concerning Quantum Gravity is only part of topic. That would be simple based on the present evidence. Has gravity of the large scale been observed in Quantum particles? I fully realize the theoretical limits, and concerning this thread I am interested in the current knowledge of the concept of deconherence as to the nature of time at the Quantum smallest scale. Has any form continuous time of the large scale been observed as the smallest Quantum particle scale.

The
 
shunyadragonvv said:
Has gravity of the large scale been observed in Quantum particles?
No. Individual particles are many orders of magnitude too small for any gravitational effects from them to be observable.

shunyadragonvv said:
Has any form continuous time of the large scale been observed as the smallest Quantum particle scale.
I don't know what you mean by this. We have seen no evidence of lack of continuity in spacetime at the smallest scales we can probe. Is that what you're asking?
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Dale
There have been some very preliminary experiments (preliminary but still quite interesting) on quantum particles in gravity fields. This is by no means getting anywhere close to gravity arising at quantum-level dimensions. So it is not an answer to the OP's questions in that regard. It only gets to quantum particles being individually affected by gravity.

Sadly, I don't have any links for either of these.

There have been some attempts to see if anti-particles fall at the same rate as particles. As far as I recall, the results were that they do, but the level of accuracy was very poor. This was a test that I remember from a seminar when I was in uni. They were dropping anti-protons. (Fermi lab? Not sure.) The issues were to get an experimental device that had weak enough electric and magnetic fields to let them drop a useful distance, and compare to regular protons. They had not entirely solved this, so the charged particles tended to get flung in unhelpful directions.

There have also been some experiments where a particle loses energy by rising through a gravity field, and so it has a very tiny little difference in energy that does interesting interferometry things. This was over-a-beer talk with a guy that was doing it for his PhD.
 
Grelbr42 said:
There have been some attempts to see if anti-particles fall at the same rate as particles. As far as I recall, the results were that they do, but the level of accuracy was very poor.
Yes, experimental limitations at this time make it very difficult to get good accuracy for these experiments.

Grelbr42 said:
There have also been some experiments where a particle loses energy by rising through a gravity field, and so it has a very tiny little difference in energy that does interesting interferometry things.
The experiment I'm aware of along these lines was done with neutrons, and basically tests whether the Newtonian gravitational potential due to height acts the same way as any other potential in the non-relativistic Schrödinger Equation. The results indicate that it does, but this is just testing standard non-relativistic QM with a gravitational potential. It is not testing any quantum aspects of gravity itself.
 
PeterDonis said:
No. Individual particles are many orders of magnitude too small for any gravitational effects from them to be observable.I don't know what you mean by this. We have seen no evidence of lack of continuity in spacetime at the smallest scales we can probe. Is that what you're asking?
I agree. The subject relates to the problem of the mergence of time from entanglement of Quantum particles. I believe recent research supports this.
 
  • #11
shunyadragonvv said:
The subject relates to the problem of the mergence of time from entanglement of Quantum particles. I believe recent research supports this.
What research are you talking about? Do you have any references?
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
  • #12
Quantum (Field) Theory as we know it and how particles are described is strongly based on a given spacetime structure, both in non-relativistic QM and special-relativistic QFT. The latter methods can be generalized to some extent to quantum field theory in "curved spacetime", i.e., in a given (classical) general-relativistic spacetime manifold. The quantization of the spacetime model itself so far has not been successful.
 
  • #13
Answer to a formula and relevance to emerging time.

Formula attached
 

Attachments

  • #14
shunyadragonvv said:
Answer to a formula and relevance to emerging time.

Formula attached
Formulas in attachments are not allowed. Please use the PF LaTeX feature to enter formulas directly in your post. There is a "LaTeX Guide" link at the lower left below each post window.
 
  • #15
I solved it myself
 
  • #17
The formula I could not post/
 
  • #18
shunyadragonvv said:
The formula I could not post/
Are you going to post your solution?
 

Similar threads

Graduate Multi-scale Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Undergrad What Are the Key Questions and Challenges in Understanding Quantum Gravity?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
High School Can particles appear from "actual" nothing including no space?
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
Undergrad Are time and space continuous or discrete?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Undergrad Why do ##t## and ##-i\hbar\partial_t## not satisfy the definition of a linear map/operator in Hilbert space?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
High School Is spacetime a quantum error correcting code?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Undergrad Why does quantum mechanics believe that gravity is a field?
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Graduate Is a Coherent Buckyball Immune to Gravity?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Undergrad Jonathan Oppenheim, "A postquantum theory of classical gravity?"
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
Undergrad Would a Quantum Theory of Gravity dispense with the Inverse....
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
14K