Quantum Dot Problem (Griffiths 7.20)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ALime88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dot Quantum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving Griffiths' Quantum Mechanics problem 7.20, which involves a 2D potential setup resembling a cross with zero potential along the arms and infinite potential elsewhere. The goal is to determine the lowest energy state that propagates to infinity without decaying. The hint provided suggests using separation of variables in the Schrödinger equation, leading to the expressions for the wave functions in terms of exponential functions. The user faces challenges with boundary conditions and interpreting the hint regarding the behavior of the wave function as it approaches infinity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Schrödinger equation in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with separation of variables technique
  • Knowledge of boundary conditions in quantum systems
  • Concept of unbound states and energy thresholds in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Review boundary condition applications in quantum mechanics problems
  • Study the concept of energy thresholds for unbound states in quantum systems
  • Explore separation of variables in the context of the Schrödinger equation
  • Investigate the implications of wave function behavior at infinity in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics, as well as educators looking for insights into teaching complex quantum problems.

ALime88
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Damn Griffiths 3-star problems... The setup for the potential is a 2D cross basically, so there's a column of zero potential 2a wide (straddling the y-axis) going to +/- infinity, and there's the same thing on the x-axis, so they cross over the origin. Everywhere else the potential is infinity. It's Griffith's 7.20 in the 2nd Edition. The goal is to find the lowest energy which propagates to infinity (doesn't decay to zero along the "arms" of the cross). The provided hint is to "Go way out one arm (say, x>>a) and solve the Schroedinger equation through Sep of Vars; if the wave function goes out to infinity the dependence on x must take the form e^ikx, k>0". Here's what I did:
\frac{-\hbar^2}{2m}(\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}+\frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2})\psi=E\psi

sub in \psi=X(x)Y(y)

\frac{X''}{X}=-\frac{Y''}{Y}-\frac{2mE}{\hbar^2}=-K^2

X=Ae^{iKx}+Be^{-iKx}, Y=Ce^{iTy}+De^{-iTy}
where T^2=-K^2+\frac{2mE}{\hbar^2}

Now I'm having trouble with the boundary conditions, as well as what Griffiths means by "Go way out one arm". Assuming we're already down this arm, Y(a)=Y(-a)=0 due to the infinite potential. That makes C=D, so
Y=\frac{C}{2}\cos(Ta)=0
Therefore T=\frac{(n+1/2)\pi}{a}

That's pretty much as far as I can get. I don't know what the boundary conditions for X would be, and that's the only way I can think of proceeding. I'm really stumped on this one, so any pointers would be nice!

- AL
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have found Ethreshold. Just plug T into the expression for E to see it. Since K has to be real for an unbound state, any unbound state must have energy greater than or equal to Ethreshold so calculated.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K