Quantum Entanglement: Entanglable particles?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Quantum entanglement (QE) can occur not only with photons but also with ions such as beryllium and magnesium, demonstrating that their movement can be intrinsically linked. Entangled pairs can include photons, electrons, and ions, with the complexity increasing for non-identical particles. To achieve entanglement, particles must be placed in a superposition of states, making their individual properties indistinguishable while maintaining a combined value. This principle adheres to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, where measuring one particle's attribute reveals the other's corresponding value.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
  • Knowledge of superposition in quantum states
  • Basic concepts of particle physics, including photons, electrons, and ions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for creating superposition in ions
  • Explore the implications of entanglement in quantum computing
  • Study the differences between entangled photon pairs and entangled ion pairs
  • Investigate current experiments involving macroscopic entanglement
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics researchers, and students interested in advanced topics of quantum entanglement and its applications in technology.

nuiluidwde
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
All the scientific documents explaining QE that I have read always refer to the entanglement of photons, and yet some news reports state that ions such as beryllium and magnesium have been entangled (http://www.livescience.com/strangenews/090603-maco-entanglement.html) so that instead of just their spin or polarization being entangled, their movement becomes intrinsically linked, so they will vibrate in opposite directions, for example.

Is this correct, can ions be entangled, and can anyone explain how? Would it mean that atoms could then be entangled, or that even larger things could be, such as compounds, or even something macroscopic like two pure aluminium balls? And can this type of entanglement be used to transfer or split energy between two or more particles?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nuiluidwde said:
All the scientific documents explaining QE that I have read always refer to the entanglement of photons, and yet some news reports state that ions such as beryllium and magnesium have been entangled (http://www.livescience.com/strangenews/090603-maco-entanglement.html) so that instead of just their spin or polarization being entangled, their movement becomes intrinsically linked, so they will vibrate in opposite directions, for example.

Is this correct, can ions be entangled, and can anyone explain how? Would it mean that atoms could then be entangled, or that even larger things could be, such as compounds, or even something macroscopic like two pure aluminium balls? And can this type of entanglement be used to transfer or split energy between two or more particles?

Welcome to PhysicsForums, nuiluidwde!

Conceptually, anything could be entangled. On the other hand, usually entanglement refers to systems of 2 identical particles. Sometimes the system consists of more than 2 particles, and sometimes the particles are not completely identical, but those situations are more complex than is probably worth discussing at this time.

You can have entangled photon pairs (easiest to create), entangled electron pair (harder), or entangled ion pairs (harder still). When a pair of particles are entangled, they can be entangled on one or more observable properties such as spin/polarization, momentum, position, energy. The entangled properties obey the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP).

To entangle a pair of particles (or objects), they must be placed in a superposition of states. Essentially, you must not be able to distinguish one from the other. All that you will know is that the combined properties have a particular value, but you will not know that value for either particle. I.e. net momentum is zero, net spin is zero, etc. So measuring an attribute for one immediately tells you the value for the other.
 
Thanks DrChinese :biggrin:, that explanation was perfect, I feel I understand it quite well now, except for how to put two particles (other than photons) into a superposition, but I guess that's what's being investigated at the moment and the crux of the scientific research.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K