Quantum Entanglement for Superluminal Communications: How Does It Work?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of quantum entanglement and its potential application in superluminal communications, as well as the broader topic of quantum communications and cryptography. Participants explore the feasibility of using quantum entanglement for communication beyond the speed of light and delve into various aspects of quantum cryptography.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question how quantum entanglement could be used for superluminal communications, expressing uncertainty about the nature of entanglement and its implications for information exchange.
  • Others assert that entanglement cannot be used for superluminal communication, stating that such communication is not possible with entanglement or any other mechanism.
  • Participants discuss the concept of quantum communications more broadly, with some expressing curiosity about its workings and applications.
  • One participant mentions that quantum computing is expected to significantly improve encryption methods, particularly in terms of security.
  • Another participant clarifies that quantum key distribution (QKD) is a method for establishing a shared secret rather than an encryption method itself, emphasizing its security advantages over classical methods.
  • Concerns are raised about the vulnerability of current encryption methods to quantum computing, highlighting the urgency of developing quantum-safe encryption algorithms.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the possibility of superluminal communication via quantum entanglement, with some asserting it is impossible while others explore the concept. The discussion on quantum communications and cryptography shows a mix of curiosity and clarification, with some agreement on the potential of quantum key distribution but varying levels of understanding and terminology.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the definitions and implications of quantum entanglement and quantum communications, indicating a need for clearer terminology and understanding of the concepts involved.

quantum.cmptr
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
How is quantum entanglement used in superluminal communications? I'm not sure whether I have the right idea of quantum entanglement (and if I do not, please correct me), but I wonder how quantum entanglement is used if the particles in entanglement are autonomous (that is to say, they can't be tampered along with maintaining the entanglement between the particles).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
quantum.cmptr said:
How is quantum entanglement used in superluminal communications? I'm not sure whether I have the right idea of quantum entanglement (and if I do not, please correct me), but I wonder how quantum entanglement is used if the particles in entanglement are autonomous (that is to say, they can't be tampered along with maintaining the entanglement between the particles).
It is not. Entanglement is not useful in exchanging information. There is no such thing as superluminal communication.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: quantum.cmptr
quantum.cmptr said:
How is quantum entanglement used in superluminal communications? I'm not sure whether I have the right idea of quantum entanglement (and if I do not, please correct me), but I wonder how quantum entanglement is used if the particles in entanglement are autonomous (that is to say, they can't be tampered along with maintaining the entanglement between the particles).

Welcome to PhysicsForums, quantum.cmptr!

As far as anyone know, superluminal (FTL) communication is not possible, neither using entanglement nor any other mechanism.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: quantum.cmptr
Thanks for all the answers!
 
Actually, what are some ways quantum communications work? I know this sounds a bit broad, but I'm curious on how it works.
 
That definitely is too broad, what exactly do you mean by 'quantum communications'
One field of communications which quantum computing is expected to improve dramatically is the field of encryptation,
also other applications.where security, 'hack-proofing', is a priority.
 
I apologize for the incorrectly phrased question. What I meant was quantum cryptography.
 
quantum.cmptr said:
I apologize for the incorrectly phrased question. What I meant was quantum cryptography.
And what research have you done so far? What have you found out?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: quantum.cmptr
  • #10
All I know is that its just a new way of encryption, and that this is supposed to be harder to actually crack in comparison to current widely-used methods.
 
  • #11
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: quantum.cmptr
  • #12
Thanks!
 
  • #13
quantum.cmptr said:
All I know is that its just a new way of encryption, and that this is supposed to be harder to actually crack in comparison to current widely-used methods.

What you're really talking about here is quantum key distribution (QKD). This is not an encryption method, but a way of establishing a shared secret between two people, in such a way that the security of their shared secret can be given strict bounds. The shared secret data can then be used as a key for cryptographic purposes.

The 'Holy Grail' of QKD is to get the key establishment rate fast enough so that we can use the One Time Pad as the encryption method to encrypt the data. The OTP is provably secure.

In security terms, then, what needs to be compared is the security of classical key distribution methods vs the quantum key distribution method. The difficulty for QKD is that in terms of a security risk assessment the threat posed to conventional classical key distribution methods is not judged to be severe currently. In other words it's not seen as a weak link in the security chain.

This threat model changes when quantum computing becomes available because many of the conventional classical key exchange mechanisms used today rely on public key cryptography, the most popular forms of which are vulnerable to quantum computers. If someone built a working quantum computer tomorrow we'd have a financial meltdown. It really is that serious because almost all of the interactions on the internet (and other networks such as the SWIFT banking network) rely in part on public key techniques that are vulnerable to quantum computation. There has been a lot of work done in trying to figure out new encryption algorithms that are resistant to attack by a quantum computer - and it's known as quantum-safe encryption.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: quantum.cmptr
  • #14
Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K