Hi All,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I've seen many derivations for the momentum operator, but I've a rather naive problem that I cannot figure out in the derivation done by Griffiths in "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" book. In chapter 1, when he derives the momentum operator he states:

[tex]\frac{d <x> }{dt} = \frac{d}{dt}\int x |\psi (x,t)|^2 dx =

\int x \frac{\partial}{\partial t} |\psi (x,t)|^2 dx [/tex]

i.e. He assumed [tex]\frac{\partial}{\partial t} x = 0 [/tex]

Why did he do that? Is there any justification for it?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Quantum mechanics momentum operator

Loading...

Similar Threads - Quantum mechanics momentum | Date |
---|---|

A Transformation of position operator under rotations | Nov 27, 2017 |

I Momentum and energy in QM and QFT | Apr 15, 2017 |

A Total derivative of momentum in quantum mechanics | Apr 10, 2017 |

I Quantum mechanics getting position operator from momentum | Sep 19, 2016 |

I About magnetic momentum in quantum mechanics | Sep 13, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**