Quantum Mechanics Positional Operator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the expectation value of the positional operator \(\hat{x}\) in quantum mechanics, specifically for a particle in a one-dimensional box described by the wave function \(\Psi_{n}(x) = \sqrt{2/L} \sin(\pi n x / L)\). Participants confirm that the expectation value \(\langle \hat{x} \rangle\) equals \(L/2\) after resolving integration errors. The correct integral setup is \(\int_0^L \frac{2x}{L} \sin^2(\pi n x / L) dx\), leading to the conclusion that the additional terms vanish when evaluated at the limits, confirming \(\langle \hat{x} \rangle = L/2\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly wave functions
  • Familiarity with the concept of expectation values in quantum systems
  • Proficiency in integral calculus, especially integration by parts
  • Knowledge of trigonometric identities and their application in integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of expectation values in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the particle-in-a-box model and its implications
  • Explore advanced integration techniques, including integration by parts
  • Investigate the role of boundary conditions in quantum wave functions
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in quantum mechanics, physicists working with wave functions, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum theory.

UbikPkd
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
\Psi_{n}(x) = \sqrt{2/L}sin(\pinx/L), 0 \leqx \leq L


\Psi_{n}(x) = 0, x<0, x>L

\pi is meant to be just normal, not superscript, sorry

n is an integer

show that <\hat{x}> = L/2




<\hat{x}> is the expectation value of the positional operator \hat{x} right?


\hat{x} \Psi= x \Psi i think so...







\int2x/L sin ^{2}(\pi2nx/L) dx

which gets me L/2 - L^{2}/4n^{2} \pi^{2}


but it is supposed to be just L/2 sigh...

any help will be much appreciated :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
UbikPkd said:
\Psi_{n}(x) = \sqrt{2/L}sin(\pinx/L), 0 \leqx \leq L


\Psi_{n}(x) = 0, x<0, x>L

\pi is meant to be just normal, not superscript, sorry

n is an integer

show that <\hat{x}> = L/2




<\hat{x}> is the expectation value of the positional operator \hat{x} right?


\hat{x} \Psi= x \Psi i think so...







\int2x/L sin ^{2}(\pi2nx/L) dx

Hint: Put everything inside a single tex quote! As in

\int_0^L ~\frac{2x}{L}~ \sin^{2}(\pi 2 n x / L) dx

This seems right (you used the limits to be 0 and L, right?)
Can you show your steps? You must have made a mistake in the integration.
 
ok here goes, i was wary of doing that because, as you can see, that was my first post and it took forever!

sorry that last one should have read:

\int_0^L ~\frac{2x}{L}~ \sin^{2}(\pi n x / L) dx \int_0^L ~\frac{x}{L}~- ~\frac{x}{L}~ \cos(2 \pi n x / L) dx

integrating by parts:

~\frac{x^{2}}{2L}-(~\frac{x}{L}~~\frac{L}{2n \pi }~\sin(~\frac{2 n \pi x}{L}~)- \int_0^L ~\frac{L}{2 n \pi L}~\sin~\frac{2n \pi x}{L}~dx )\left[ ~\frac{x^{2}}{2L}-~\frac{x}{2n \pi}~\sin(~\frac{2 n \pi x}{L}~)- ~\frac{L}{4 n^{2} \pi^{2}}~\cos~\frac{2n \pi x}{L}~ \right] (between L and 0)

= ~\frac{L}{2}~ - ~\frac{L}{4 n^{2} \pi^{2}}~

but it should just be ~\frac{L}{2}~ ?
 
Last edited:
you have basically worked out the answer, it's just that you forgot that the when zero is put in as a limit in the second part (the cosine part), it gives 1 aswell. i.e. cos(2 \pi n) = cos(0), so the second part that you got disappears, leaving you with just the L/2 which is what you want.

&lt;x&gt; = ~\frac{L}{2}~ - ~\frac{L}{(2 \pi n)^2}~ + ~\frac{L}{(2 \pi n)^2}~
 
Last edited:
ppyadof said:
you have basically worked out the answer, it's just that you forgot that the when zero is put in as a limit in the second part (the cosine part), it gives 1 aswell. i.e. cos(2 \pi n) = cos(0), so the second part that you got disappears, leaving you with just the L/2 which is what you want.

&lt;x&gt; = ~\frac{L}{2}~ - ~\frac{L}{(2 \pi n)^2}~ + ~\frac{L}{(2 \pi n)^2}~

AHHHHHH I've done that so many times, still i haven't learnt, thank you very much, both of you!

nrqed
i read your blog, a few days ago id never done any quantum, they threw us in by asking for the wave function of the 'particle in a box' . It was a steep learning curve that lasted all night and several litres of coffee...got there in the end!
 
UbikPkd said:
AHHHHHH I've done that so many times, still i haven't learnt, thank you very much, both of you!

nrqed
i read your blog, a few days ago id never done any quantum, they threw us in by asking for the wave function of the 'particle in a box' . It was a steep learning curve that lasted all night and several litres of coffee...got there in the end!

That's ok. Only too glad to help. Steep learning curves are the best in the long run, take my word for it :P
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
46
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K