Quantum Mechanics problem: Determine the value of the constant

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
Ineedhelpimbadatphys
Messages
9
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
The problem states work for word.

Using canonical quantization relation, prove that
sum operator ((E_n -E_0)) |< E_n | X | E_0 >|^2) = constant

Where E_0 is the energy corresponding to the eigenstate | E_0 >. Determine the value of the constant. Assume the hamiltonian had a general form H = P/2m +V(X)

Hint: One way to proof this is to think how [H, X], X] is connected to the obove identity.
Relevant Equations
all equations i have are in the statement.
I have no idea where to start with this problem. I am interested in any hints, or ways to proof this. But i would especially like to know how the commutator is connected to the identity.
 

Attachments

  • 385A8420-90F2-4204-8439-15C0224B4160.jpeg
    385A8420-90F2-4204-8439-15C0224B4160.jpeg
    25.8 KB · Views: 158
Physics news on Phys.org
Please, everyone, be respectful of poster asking for a hint about one specific aspect of this problem.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark, Lord Jestocost and berkeman
Ineedhelpimbadatphys said:
Homework Statement:: The problem states work for word.

Using canonical quantization relation, prove that
sum operator ((E_n -E_0)) |< E_n | X | E_0 >|^2) = constant

Where E_0 is the energy corresponding to the eigenstate | E_0 >. Determine the value of the constant. Assume the hamiltonian had a general form H = P/2m +V(X)

Hint: One way to proof this is to think how [H, X], X] is connected to the obove identity.
Relevant Equations:: all equations i have are in the statement.

I have no idea where to start with this problem. I am interested in any hints, or ways to proof this. But i would especially like to know how the commutator is connected to the identity.
What is ##< E_0 \mid [H,X],X]] \mid E_0 >##?

-Dan
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Thank you so much. I did actually manage to figure it out. I had tried calculatibg that, and got stuck at < E_0 | XHX | E_n > and assumed I was wrong.

After seeing this, I just kept trying and got it. thank you.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and topsquark