Undergrad Quantum Mechanics, The Delta-Function potential

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Delta-Function potential in quantum mechanics, specifically the time-independent Schrödinger equation and its implications for bound states. The potential is defined as ##V(x) = -\alpha \delta(x)##, where ##\alpha > 0##. It is established that for bound states, the energy must satisfy ##E < 0##, leading to the eigenvalue solution of ##E = -\frac{m \alpha^2}{2 \hbar^2}##. The participants clarify that there is no minimum potential value, thus allowing for bound states with energy less than zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly the Schrödinger equation.
  • Familiarity with the concept of Delta-Function potentials.
  • Knowledge of bound states and energy eigenvalues in quantum systems.
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical notation used in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Delta-Function potentials in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the time-independent Schrödinger equation and its applications.
  • Explore the concept of bound states and scattering states in quantum systems.
  • Investigate the role of potential energy in determining eigenvalues and eigenstates.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics, as well as researchers exploring potential energy functions and their effects on particle behavior.

eliUCV
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have a question, why when we study the Delta-Function Potencial we can treat with ##E < V##, since the following relation says

##\frac{d^2 \psi}{dx^2} = \frac{2m}{\hbar^2} (V - E) \psi##

And do not allow it? or it is just ##E < V_{min}## ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes eliUCV and Mentz114
Thanks :D
## V(x) = - \alpha \delta(x) ## where ## \alpha > 0 ##
I think it is important to say that it is time-independent Schrödinger's Equation
 
Yep. Exactly matches the treatise in the link. One bound state.
For ##\ V(x) = - \alpha \delta(x) \ ## there is no ##V_{min}\ ## so no ## E < V_{min}\ ##; did you mean ## E < V_{max}##, in this case 0 ?
 
  • Like
Likes eliUCV
Yes, could E be less than V_max ?
 
V max is zero. E is less, yes: a bound state
 
Ok, but E never can be less than ## V_{min}## for any ##V(x)##, right??
 
Correct.
 
Since in
$$\hat{H}=\frac{1}{2m} \hat{p}^2 + V(\hat{x}),$$
the first term ("kinetic energy") it's a positive definite operator. For the very artificial potential in question, somewhat sloppily speaking the potential has a minimum at ##x=0## (namely "##-\infty##") there. The energy eigenvalues thus must all be ##>-\infty##, which is hardly a constraint.

To get the eigenvalues you have to solve the time-independent Schrödinger equation,
$$-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} u_E''(x) -\alpha \delta(x) u_E(x)=E u_E(x).$$
For bound states you need ##E<0##, but for ##E<0## the only solution must be of the form
$$\psi(x)=A \exp(-k|x|), \quad k>0.$$
Now
$$\psi'(x)=-A k \mathrm{sign}(x) \exp(-k |x|)$$
and
$$\psi''(x)=[A k^2 -2 A k \delta(x)] \exp(-k |x|).$$
Plugging this into the Schrödinger equation we get (cancelling the common A exp factor)
$$-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} [k^2 - 2 k \delta(x)]-\alpha \delta(x)=E.$$
So the only bound-state solution is to make the ##\delta## distribution contribution vanish by choosing
$$\frac{\hbar^2}{m} k = \alpha \;\Rightarrow \; k=\frac{m \alpha}{\hbar^2}.$$
From this we get
$$E=-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} k^2 = -\frac{m \alpha^2}{2 \hbar^2}.$$
Of course there are plenty of scattering solutions with ##E>0## too.
 
  • Like
Likes eliUCV

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
981
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
555
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K