The discussion centers on the comparative analysis of two quantum mechanics textbooks: "A Modern Approach to Quantum Mechanics" by Townsend and "Quantum Mechanics" by McIntyre. Participants highlight that Townsend covers essential topics such as angular momentum and the Aharonov-Bohm effect, which are absent in McIntyre. While some prefer McIntyre for its engaging style, others advocate for Townsend due to its comprehensive content. Ultimately, both books are deemed valuable, but Townsend is recommended for a more thorough understanding of quantum mechanics.
PREREQUISITESStudents of quantum mechanics, educators teaching advanced physics, and anyone seeking a deeper understanding of quantum theory through comprehensive resources.
I like McIntyre better than Townsend. YMMV.Figaro said:I noticed that there are some topics missing in Mcintyre (i.e. variational method, short intro to scattering, etc) but Townsend starts early about angular momentum, can anyone comment on these issues?
Why is that? I would like to know your comment and experience on this book. Is it complete? As I saw it, there are topics which are not in Mcintyre where it is present in Townsend, for example, Aharonov Bohm effect, some I stated above, etc.smodak said:I like McIntyre better than Townsend. YMMV.
Just personal Preference. I find McIntyre to be less dry than Townsend. I was self studying and McIntyre kept me engaged and interested but Townsend did not. They are both very good book however - you cannot go wrong with either of them. QM is such a vast area, one book is not often sufficient. You can always go back to several other resources when you have had a chance to study the fundamentals from a book that you like.Figaro said:Why is that? I would like to know your comment and experience on this book. Is it complete? As I saw it, there are topics which are not in Mcintyre where it is present in Townsend, for example, Aharonov Bohm effect, some I stated above, etc.