Quantum optics is a reference to a c-number

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
quantum optics is a reference to a "c-number"

Hi

In my lecture notes on quantum optics is a reference to a "c-number" electric field, and it is stated that, since it is a c-number, there is no corresponding Hamiltonian. As far as I have understood, a c-number is a classical value of some (possibly quantum mechanical) quantity. However, how can this rule out that the c-number has a Hamiltonian? E.g., a classical electric field has a well-defined Hamiltonian given by its energy density.


Niles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Niles, This would be an approximation, in which the degrees of freedom of the electric field are ignored and the field is treated as a constant external quantity maintained by a classical source.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top