Semiclassical descriptions of atom-light interaction

  • Thread starter Thread starter Niles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interaction
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the Hamiltonian for the interaction between a free atom and a classical electromagnetic field, specifically the term representing the energy density of the classical field, HE. The classical Hamiltonian is typically expressed as H = ½(E² + B²), and can be transformed into a quantum form using the radiation gauge. The Fourier transform of the vector potential leads to a Hamiltonian expressed in terms of creation and annihilation operators. The transition to quantum mechanics occurs when the product of these operators is related to the number operator. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of the explanation provided for understanding the classical and quantum aspects of the Hamiltonian.
Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi

Say I want to describe the interaction between a free atom atom and a classical EM field. The full Hamiltonian for the problem must be
<br /> H = (H_0 + p^2/2m) + (H_V + H_E) + H_D <br />
where H0 denotes the internal levels of the atom, HV the vacuum field, HE the energy density of the classical field and HD the dipole interaction.

My question is regarding HE. I have never seen it written explicitly and have not been able to find a reference where they do so. How would one write this? Is it QM-version of something similar to Poyntings vector?Niles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Hamiltonian for a classical drive is something along the line of

<br /> E(e^{-i\omega t}a^\dagger+e^{i \omega t} a)<br />

I would suggest you look up some info about the driven Jaynes-Cummings model
 
Last edited:
The usual form for the classical Hamiltonian for the electromagnetic field is the energy density, H = ½(E2 + B2). The easiest way to get to the quantum form is to use the radiation gauge, Φ = 0 and ∇·A = 0, allowing H to be written in terms of the vector potential as H = ½((A·)2 + (∇ x A)2).

Now Fourier transform, A = ∫d3k/√(2ω) ∑ε(k)[a(k)e-ik·x + a*eik·x], where ε(k) are polarization vectors. In terms of a(k) the Hamiltonian reduces to H = ∫d3k ω ∑a*(k)a(k). This is still classical.

Quantum mechanics comes in when you now say that a*(k)a(k) = ħ N(k) where N(k) is the number operator.
 
Ah, I see. Thanks for taking the time to explain that. I will study your reply in depth.

Best wishes,
Niles.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K