Quantum spherical harmonic oscillator:eigenfunctions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding eigenfunctions common to the Hamiltonian, angular momentum operators, and the radial equation in the context of a spherical symmetric harmonic oscillator. The original poster presents the Hamiltonian in spherical coordinates and seeks assistance in solving the radial equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various methods for solving the radial equation, including substitutions and series solutions. Some suggest using Legendre polynomials, while others discuss the implications of different values of angular momentum quantum number l. There is also a consideration of boundary conditions and the nature of the solutions.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering different methods and questioning the validity of each other's approaches. Some have provided insights into the form of the solutions, while others are seeking clarification on specific steps and the correctness of their reasoning.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of boundary conditions and the requirement for solutions to have finite area under them, which may constrain the allowed eigenvalues. Additionally, the discussion includes references to specific mathematical functions and their relevance to the problem at hand.

folgorant
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hi to everybody of PF community!

I have some troubles to find eigenfunctions common to [tex]H, L_{z}, L^2[/tex] in the problem of spherical simmetric harmonic oscillator.

I start with the Hamiltonian [tex]H=\frac{\textbf{p}^2}{2 \mu} - \frac{1}{2}k\textbf{x}^2[/tex] that in spherical coordinates become

[tex]H=\frac{- \hbar ^2}{2 \mu} (\frac{\partial^2}{r \partial r^2} r - \frac{L^2}{r^2 \hbar^2}) - \frac{k r^2}{2}[/tex]

now,the eigenfunctions equation is: [tex]H \psi = E \psi[/tex]

i know the angular part of the problem that are the spherical armonics...so it remain to solve the radial equation

[tex](\frac{- \hbar ^2}{2 \mu} \frac{\partial^2}{r \partial r^2} r + \frac{\hbar^2 l(l+1)}{2 \mu r^2 } - \frac{k r^2}{2}) R(r) = E R(r)[/tex]

then i don't know if to try with the hydrogen-like method (but potential is different) or with the armonic 1D oscillator (but I don't know whato to do with the centrifugal term)...so, please give me an help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Some of the community might be more familiar with these things, but my understanding is that it's normal to look for series solutions. The requirement that the solution has a finite area under it usually constrains the allowed eigenvalues, and gives you some series of polynomials. I forget, but I think you should get Legendre polynomials?
 
Make the substitution [itex]u(r) = r R(r)[/itex] and you should find that the equation reduces to

[tex]\frac{d^2 u}{dr^2} = \displaystyle \left[ \frac{l(l+1)}{r^2} - k^2 \right] u[/tex]

For [itex]l=0[/itex] this will reduce to the simple harmonic oscillator. For [itex]l \neq 0[/itex] you will find solutions in the form of spherical Bessel and Neumann functions. You can look up the ode's that correspond to those functions and they'll show you how to solve them.
 
Hi! The radial solution to:

[tex](\frac{- \hbar ^2}{2mr^2} \frac{d}{dr}(r^2\frac{d}{dr}) + \frac{\hbar^2 l(l+1)}{2 m r^2 } + U(r))R(r) = E R(r)[/tex]


by using [itex]u(r) = r R(r)[/itex]


and [itex]U(r) = \frac{1}{2}m\omega ^2 r^2[/itex]

and imposing BC:
[itex]u(0) = 0[/itex]
[itex]u(r) = 0 , r \rightarrow \infty[/itex]

is the radial Laguerre equation:

[tex]u_{kl}(r) = r^{l+1}e^{-\nu r^2}L^{l+1/2}_k(2\nu r^2)[/tex]

Where L is Laguerre polynomial and
[tex]\nu = m\omega / 2\hbar[/tex]

Source: Nuclear Shell Model, Kris Heyde, Springer 1994
 
Last edited:
if I make the substitution : [tex]u(r)=rR(r)[/tex]

it become:

[tex](\frac{- \hbar ^2}{2 \mu} \frac{\partial^2}{\partial r^2} + \frac{\hbar^2 l(l+1)}{2 \mu r^2 } - \frac{k r^2}{2}) u(r) = u R(r)[/tex]

...isn't it??

so... after find the solution to be [tex]u_{kl}(r) = r^{l+1}e^{-\nu r^2}L^{l+1/2}_k(2\ny r^2)[/tex]
...I have to divide by a factor r to obtain R(r)??
like [tex]R_{kl}(r) = r^{l}e^{-\nu r^2}L^{l+1/2}_k(2\ny r^2)[/tex] ?

and another my question is:where I could find the solution to that ode?

thanks
 
malawi: ops...I see now the "source" of solution you give to me
 
Search for Laguerre ODE
 
but...is my post n°5 correct?
 
  • #10
[tex](\frac{- \hbar ^2}{2 \mu} \frac{\partial^2}{r \partial r^2} r + \frac{\hbar^2 l(l+1)}{2 \mu r^2 } - \frac{m \omega^2 r^2}{2}) R(r) = E R(r)[/tex]

[tex]u(r)=rR(r)[/tex]

[tex]\frac{\partial^2}{r \partial r^2} r = \frac{\partial}{r^2 \partial r}(r^2 \frac{\partial}{\partial r})[/tex]

[tex]u_{kl}(r) = r^{l+1}e^{-\nu r^2}L^{l+1/2}_k(2\nu r^2)[/tex]

[tex]\nu = m\omega / 2\hbar[/tex]

[tex]u_{kl}(r) = r^{l+1} e^\frac{-2m\omega r^2}{2\hbar} L^{l+1/2}_k(\frac{m\omega r^2}{\hbar})[/tex]

[tex]R_{kl}(r) = r^{l} e^\frac{-2m\omega r^2}{2\hbar} L^{l+1/2}_k(\frac{m\omega r^2}{\hbar})[/tex]

[tex]R_{10}(r) = re^\frac{-m \omega r^2}{2\hbar}[/tex]

Continue in next post……
 
  • #11
...continue:

and the next is what I found with another method:

[tex](\frac{- \hbar ^2}{2 \mu} \frac{\partial^2}{r \partial r^2} r + \frac{\hbar^2 l(l+1)}{2 \mu r^2 } - \frac{m \omega^2 r^2}{2}) R(r) = E R(r)[/tex]

[tex]\rho=\alpha r[/tex]

[tex]\alpha=\sqrt{m \omega/ \hbar}[/tex]

[tex]dr=\frac{d \rho}{\alpha}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{2 \mu E}{\hbar^2 \alpha^2} = \frac{2 E}{\hbar \omega} = \lambda[/tex]

[tex]\frac{d^2}{r dr^2}r = \frac{d^2}{dr^2} + \frac{2d}{rdr}[/tex]

[tex](\frac{d^2}{d \rho^2} + \frac{2 d}{\rho d \rho} - \frac{l(l+1)}{\rho^2} - \rho^2 + \lambda) R(\rho) = 0[/tex]

that is a particular ODE : [tex](\frac{d^2}{d \rho^2} + p(\rho)\frac{d}{d \rho} +q(\rho)) R(\rho) = 0[/tex]

and solutions are [tex]R(\rho)=\rho^{\beta} \sum^{0}_{\infty}c_{n} \rho^n[/tex] where beta is a constant and Cn is a function both dependents from the powers series of functions p(x) and q(x). The procedure is very long to write in latex, I did it in my exercise-book and the resul is different : [tex]R_{10}= \frac{-2E}{6 \hbar \omega}\rho^2[/tex]
If anybody wants to see the procedure I'll write it ,also if it will be an hard work...

anyway...any suggest??
 

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
46
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K