Graduate Quantum synchronization description used in a paper

Click For Summary
The paper discusses the concept of steady-state synchronization of atomic dipoles, which is essential for creating ultra-stable optical lasers. It explains that the synchronization process involves the development of a preferred relative phase between pairs of spins, leading to a collective dipole formed by correlated atoms. A mathematical expression for this synchronization can be represented as the correlation C_{ij} = E[cos(ϕ_i - φ_j)], where ϕ_i and ϕ_j are the relative phases of spins i and j. This formulation helps clarify the synchronization dynamics described in the paper. Understanding this mathematical representation is crucial for further research in quantum synchronization.
Danny Boy
Messages
48
Reaction score
3
In the paper "Steady-state spin synchronization through the collective motion of trapped ions" it states the following:

"Steady-state synchronization of atomic dipoles forms the foundation for ultra-stable optical lasers utilizing
narrow-linewidth atoms coupled to a lossy cavity mode. The cavity mode acts as a channel for synchronization of the atomic dipoles (spins) resulting in a macroscopic collective dipole in steady-state composed of correlated atoms. Synchronization here refers to the development of a preferred relative phase (correlations) between every pair of spins. "

Question:
Does anyone know how the statement in bold could be expressed mathematically (to add some clarity)?

Thanks for any assistance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Answer: The statement in bold can be expressed mathematically as: Let ϕ_i and ϕ_j be the relative phases between spins i and j, then the steady-state synchronization of atomic dipoles is given by the correlationC_{ij} = E[cos(ϕ_i - φ_j)]
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
18K