Quantum theory without classical time: quantum gravity and unification

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a paper proposing a new Theory of Everything that derives fundamental concepts such as 4D Spacetime, Quantum Physics, Gravitation, and the Standard Model from first principles, specifically using Trace Dynamics and 8D octonionic Space. The paper claims to accurately derive the fine structure constant, α, to a precision of approximately 1 part in 10^5. Participants express intrigue regarding the feasibility and implications of this approach, particularly its incorporation of Division Algebras in foundational theories.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Trace Dynamics
  • Familiarity with 8D octonionic Space
  • Knowledge of Quantum Physics principles
  • Basic concepts of the Standard Model of particle physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Trace Dynamics in theoretical physics
  • Explore the role of Division Algebras in quantum gravity theories
  • Study the derivation of the fine structure constant in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate current advancements in unifying quantum mechanics and general relativity
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, researchers in quantum gravity, and anyone interested in the unification of fundamental forces and the mathematical foundations of physics.

the_pulp
Messages
206
Reaction score
9
TL;DR
This paper looks as a new Theory of Everything that from first principles (Trace Dynamics, Division Algebras, ...) seems to derive a lot of things (4D Spacetime, Quantum Mechanics, Standard Model, ...)
It came to my attention yesterday this, from my ignorant point of view, amazing paper that describes what it looks as another Theory of Everything: https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.02062

If I didnt understand incorrectly, from first principles / a pre quantum theory (Trace Dynamics, 8D octonionic Space, ...) it derives:
1) 4D Spacetime
2) Quantum Physics
3) Gravitation / Metric Tensor /...
4) Standard Model with its 3 generations
5) Many of its numerical parameters

I am not a proffesional in the subject at all so, as a consequence, I would highly appreciate any comment regarding this paper. Is my understanding correct? Does it look feasible? As a consequence of your understanding of this paper, do you give any credit to this line of investigation? Ps: I am always easily seduced by papers that tries to incorporate Division Algebras in First Principles so, as this paper claims to do it successfully, that's why it caught my attention,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm intrigued by this paper also. I haven't begun to grasp most of it, but I kind of "sat up and took notice" when I saw what seemed like a simple, logical derivation of the fine structure constant that is accurate to ~ 1 part in 10^5:
\alpha = \exp((\frac{1}{3} - \sqrt{\frac{3}{8}})\frac{2}{3})\frac{9}{1024} = 0.00729713.
I'm not sure if there is something there, or if it is just numerology. I would love to hear what @john baez thinks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
15K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K