Quantum versus classical computation of the density of state

In summary, the conversation discusses the relationship between the energy spectrum of a quantum mechanical system and the phase space of a classical system. The question asks for proof that the quantum expression will always approach the classical one in phase space for any given physical system and provided a classical limit is used. The Correspondence Principle is suggested as a potential source for this proof.
  • #1
Jip
20
2
Hi,
If I consider for instance N non interacting particles in a box, I can compute the energy spectrum quantum mechanically, and thus the number of (quantum) microstates corresponding to a total energy between $E_0$ and $E_0 + \delta E$. In the limit of large quantum numbers, the result is well known to coincide with the available volume of the phase space of the corresponding classical system of N Newtonian free particles in a box, namely
$$
\Omega(E_0,V,N; \delta E)_{\textbf{quantum}} \to \frac{1}{h^N} \int_{E_0<E<E_0 +\delta E} d^{3N}x d^{3N}p
$$
in the limit of large quantum numbers.

My question is the following. Is there any proof, besides this specific example of the quantum gas in a box, that the quantum expression is always going to approach the classical one in phase space, for any given physical system (and thus for some generalized coordinates), provided some classical limit is used?

This does not seem a trivial statement to me, and I can't find the proof in textbooks.

Many thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You've probably already read it, but the Wikipedia page on the Correspondence Principle might be a good source of sources for this question.
 

1. What is the difference between quantum and classical computation of the density of state?

The density of state refers to the number of states that are available to a system at a certain energy level. Quantum computation of the density of state takes into account the principles of quantum mechanics, such as superposition and entanglement, to accurately calculate the number of states. Classical computation, on the other hand, uses classical physics principles and is limited in its ability to accurately calculate the density of state.

2. Which method is more accurate in calculating the density of state?

Quantum computation is generally considered to be more accurate in calculating the density of state compared to classical computation. This is because quantum mechanics allows for a more precise and detailed understanding of the behavior of particles at the atomic and subatomic levels, which is crucial in calculating the density of state.

3. Can quantum computation be used for all types of systems?

Quantum computation can be applied to a wide range of systems, including molecules, atoms, and solid-state materials. However, it is not suitable for all systems, particularly those that involve large-scale interactions and complex dynamics. In these cases, classical computation may be a better option for calculating the density of state.

4. How does quantum computation impact the field of material science?

Quantum computation has significantly impacted the field of material science by providing a more accurate and efficient way to calculate the density of state for various materials. This has allowed for a deeper understanding of the properties and behavior of materials, leading to the development of new and improved materials for various applications.

5. Are there any practical applications of quantum computation of the density of state?

Yes, there are several practical applications of quantum computation of the density of state. One example is in the field of drug discovery, where accurate calculations of the density of state can aid in predicting the behavior and effectiveness of new drugs. It is also used in the development of new materials for technology and renewable energy sources.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
794
Replies
4
Views
134
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
9
Views
789
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
55
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
733
Replies
1
Views
719
Replies
3
Views
795
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
744
Back
Top