Hi,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

If I consider for instance N non interacting particles in a box, I can compute the energy spectrum quantum mechanically, and thus the number of (quantum) microstates corresponding to a total energy between $E_0$ and $E_0 + \delta E$. In the limit of large quantum numbers, the result is well known to coincide with the available volume of the phase space of the corresponding classical system of N newtonian free particles in a box, namely

$$

\Omega(E_0,V,N; \delta E)_{\textbf{quantum}} \to \frac{1}{h^N} \int_{E_0<E<E_0 +\delta E} d^{3N}x d^{3N}p

$$

in the limit of large quantum numbers.

My question is the following. Is there any proof, besides this specific example of the quantum gas in a box, that the quantum expression is always going to approach the classical one in phase space, for any given physical system (and thus for some generalized coordinates), provided some classical limit is used?

This does not seem a trivial statement to me, and I can't find the proof in textbooks.

Many thanks.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# A Quantum versus classical computation of the density of state

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Quantum versus classical | Date |
---|---|

Classical versus quantum momentum | Jun 4, 2015 |

Classical versus quantum interference. | Jan 18, 2014 |

Classical versus quantum information | Jun 17, 2013 |

Quantum amplitudes versus probability | Mar 27, 2013 |

Intensity in Electromagnetism versus probability density in Quantum Mechanics | Apr 9, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**