Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the identification of a specific image of a quasar emitting gamma radiation, as seen on a science channel program. Participants explore the nature of quasars, gamma ray bursts, and the accuracy of representations in media, while seeking to clarify the details surrounding the image and its context.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Debate/contested
- Conceptual clarification
Main Points Raised
- One participant describes seeing a real image of a quasar with a gamma radiation burst, resembling Hubble deep field photos.
- Another participant expresses interest in the image and asks for the name of the show where it was featured.
- The show "How the Universe Works" is identified, with a specific episode discussing black holes and claiming to show a real image of a gamma beam.
- A participant suggests that the image might be of the relativistic jet from M87, clarifying that M87 is not a quasar but an active galactic nucleus, and notes the distance difference between M87 and quasars.
- One participant acknowledges that the suggested image is indeed the one they were referring to but expresses confusion over the program's claims regarding quasars and gamma bursts.
- Another participant questions the accuracy of the program's statements, arguing that gamma ray bursts do not resemble relativistic jets and that Hubble cannot detect gamma rays.
- A participant raises a question about the existence of quasars in nearby galaxies despite their high redshift, referencing an external article.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants do not reach consensus on the accuracy of the program's claims regarding quasars and gamma ray bursts, with some expressing skepticism about the information presented. There are competing views on the nature of the image and the definitions of quasars versus active galactic nuclei.
Contextual Notes
There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of quasars and gamma ray bursts, as well as the capabilities of telescopes like Hubble in detecting such phenomena. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the accuracy of media representations of astronomical objects.
But they were also talking about black holes and whatnot. I'm going to have to re-watch that, clearly I misunderstood what they said.