Question about a complex regarded as a topological space

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A complex K, when regarded as a topological space, is defined as a polyhedron denoted by |K|. The discussion clarifies that if K is a simplicial complex in E^n, taking the simplexes of K separately and applying the identification topology results in the topological realization |K|. The cone CK is distinguished from its topological realization |CK|, with the former being a simplicial complex and the latter a topological space. The distinction between simplicial complexes and their topological realizations is essential, as they possess independent theories and properties.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of simplicial complexes and their properties
  • Familiarity with topological spaces and identification topology
  • Knowledge of homeomorphism and its implications in topology
  • Basic concepts of cones in topology
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of identification topology in detail
  • Explore the properties and applications of simplicial complexes
  • Learn about homeomorphisms and their significance in topology
  • Investigate the theory of cones in topological spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, topologists, and students studying algebraic topology, particularly those interested in the relationships between simplicial complexes and topological spaces.

kakarotyjn
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
Definition. A complex K,when regarded as a topological space,is called a polyhedron and written |K|.

I think it is easy to understand the definition,but there are some theorem and problems involving it confused me.

1.Let K be a simplicial complex in E^n,if we take the simplexes of K separately and give their union the identification topology,then we obtain exactly |K|.

And also I don't understand explicitly about identification topology,I only know a set A in Y is open if and only if \pi ^{ - 1} (A) is open in X for which \pi
is the map from X to the identification space Y.

What exactly does it means by saying 'if we take simplexes of K separately and give their union the identification topology'?What occurs to the simplexes of K by this?

2.Check that |CK| and C|K| are homeomorphic spaces.

Does it need proof? I think |CK|=C|K|,isn't it? If not,what's the difference between them?

Thank you very much!:smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kakarotyjn said:
Definition. A complex K,when regarded as a topological space,is called a polyhedron and written |K|.

I think it is easy to understand the definition,but there are some theorem and problems involving it confused me.

1.Let K be a simplicial complex in E^n,if we take the simplexes of K separately and give their union the identification topology,then we obtain exactly |K|.

And also I don't understand explicitly about identification topology,I only know a set A in Y is open if and only if \pi ^{ - 1} (A) is open in X for which \pi
is the map from X to the identification space Y.

What exactly does it means by saying 'if we take simplexes of K separately and give their union the identification topology'?What occurs to the simplexes of K by this?

2.Check that v| are homeomorphic spaces.

Does it need proof? I think |CK|=C|K|,isn't it? If not,what's the difference between them?

Thank you very much!:smile:

1. The simplices separately each have the topology they inherit as polyhedra in Euclidean space. These polyhedra are then glued together along facets of the simplices to produce the topological realization of the simplicial complex.

2.what are |CK| and C|K?
 
Thank you,lavinia! It seems a little clearer to me

CK is the cone on K.
 
kakarotyjn said:
2.Check that |CK| and C|K| are homeomorphic spaces.

Does it need proof? I think |CK|=C|K|,isn't it? If not,what's the difference between them?

I think C|K| is the cone on a topological space. |K| denotes a topological space not a simplicial complex.

CK is a simplicial complex not a topological space. |CK| is its topological realization.
 
I can't figure out why we distinguish the two concepts so preciously,why not regard a simplex not only a simplex but also a topological space?:confused:
 
kakarotyjn said:
I can't figure out why we distinguish the two concepts so preciously,why not regard a simplex not only a simplex but also a topological space?:confused:

A simplicial complex is a scaffholding overlayed upon a topological space. It is not a topological structure in and of itself. A given space will have infinite many different simplicial decompositions.

Simplicial complexes have there own theory, independent of their topology, e.g. they have homology theories.

An interesting question for manifolds is whether two simplicial decompositions are equivalent i.e. whether each can be subdivided into the same complex. If only the topology were interesting then this would be true. But there are examples where this fails this is, there are simplicial decompositions of the same topological space that are not equivalent.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K