Question about Al Jazeera (English live stream)

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter phinds
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stream
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around perceptions of Al Jazeera's English language news feed, particularly regarding its reporting on the Middle East and its potential biases. Participants explore the differences between news reporting and opinion pieces, as well as the historical context of Al Jazeera's establishment and its evolution over time.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express surprise at the perceived even-handedness of Al Jazeera's news reporting compared to expectations of bias against Israel.
  • Others suggest that the difference in tone may stem from the distinction between news reporting and opinion pieces, with some participants acknowledging potential confusion between the two.
  • A participant notes that Al Jazeera's English content may cater to a different audience than its Arabic broadcasts, potentially leading to differing biases.
  • Several participants agree that Al Jazeera's reporting on the Middle East is often more accurate than that of other news sources, citing personal experiences and long-term readership.
  • There is mention of Al Jazeera's historical roots in the BBC and its evolution as a news organization, particularly in relation to its coverage of events in the Middle East.
  • Some participants question whether Al Jazeera has shifted in its reporting style over time, with references to changes in political climates affecting media narratives.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express mixed views on Al Jazeera's reporting, with some finding it balanced and others perceiving bias. There is no consensus on whether the channel's content is uniformly representative of its overall stance.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of distinguishing between news and opinion pieces, as well as the potential influence of audience expectations on perceived bias. The discussion reflects varying personal experiences and interpretations of Al Jazeera's reporting.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals seeking diverse perspectives on Middle Eastern news coverage, media bias, and the role of opinion in news reporting.

phinds
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
19,385
Reaction score
15,617
I very recently started watching Al Jazeera's live English language news feed and I have now been shocked twice.

The following is based on a relatively small amount of information/evidence and that is the reason for the question at the end of this.

First, I was absolutely amazed to find that the program seems to be as even-handed as the BBC in its reporting. I had expected something from mild to rabid Israel bashing and just didn't see it. I was very pleasantly surprised at the quality of the reporting on all things Middle East so about a week ago I took to watching it a fair amount, probably even more than I check news on the BBC since I can't get the BBC live feed.

THEN, a couple of days ago I noticed a side-bar on some additional written material so I decided to check that out and that's when I got my second shock. I found that the written material was exactly what I had expected the whole channel to be ... rabid hatred of Israel. It seems to have been produced by a completely different organization than the one that produces the on-air news feed (and in fact, it may be).

SO ... my question is can anyone here who has a more long-term experience with Al Jazeera comment on my impressions? Specifically, have I found an UNrepresentative situation on either the live feed or the written material due to such a small amount of experience with it, or does my initial impression about how it is with each seem to you to be an accurate reflection of the channel in over the long haul?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It could be the difference in reporting actual news and a personal opinion piece.

I haven't noticed problems with their news reporting, but I rely on the BBC for world news, so I haven't watched much Al Jazeera.
 
I haven't noticed an anti-israel bias, though I'm anti-Israel myself, so maybe I'm just blind to any subtle bias.
 
I am an American and have been reading Al Jazeera's English news website for approximately two years. I find its reporting usually quite honest and well-balanced. In fact, as for the Middle East, (where I have lived for seven years) it often gives a more accurate picture of events than any other news source. Of course there are opinion pieces, and some pretty far out, but Al Jazeera clearly marks Opinion from News. I follow BBC, Reuters, and several more hoping for an accurate picture. I consider Al Jazeera an essential ingredient for part of the total coverage of news. Also, reading its editorials and opinion pieces gives us a viewpoint not found anywhere else. It is up to you to gather news from a variety of sources, sum them together with your values, and then decide what to believe.
 
They used to be more mainstream when they were emerging. But (I think), something happened in Washington that prevented that.
 
Evo said:
It could be the difference in reporting actual news and a personal opinion piece.

DOH ! I think that may well be what I've overlooked. I was possible reading opinion pieces and taking them to be news reporting.

I haven't noticed problems with their news reporting, but I rely on the BBC for world news, so I haven't watched much Al Jazeera.

I would love to the the BBC live feed but I get the message "not available in your area" (which is the US) --- I guess that's reasonable. The people of England pay for this and I would be hogging some of their bandwidth that I haven't paid for.
 
Bobbywhy said:
I am an American and have been reading Al Jazeera's English news website for approximately two years. I find its reporting usually quite honest and well-balanced. In fact, as for the Middle East, (where I have lived for seven years) it often gives a more accurate picture of events than any other news source.

Very glad to hear it. That was my impression.

Also, reading its editorials and opinion pieces gives us a viewpoint not found anywhere else.

Well, that's a charitable way of putting it.

It is up to you to gather news from a variety of sources, sum them together with your values, and then decide what to believe.

Agreed. As I said in the post directly above, I think my mistake might have been reading opinion pieces and thinking that they were pretending to be straight reporting.
 
Willowz said:
They used to be more mainstream when they were emerging. But (I think), something happened in Washington that prevented that.

Actually, I had heard the opposite of that. What I had heard was that when they started, there was a bias in the news reporting but when they opened the English language version, they made a strong effort to do away with that.

I HAVE heard, but have no evidence, that the Arab language broadcasts are quite different in tone than the English language ones and DO exhibit a bias --- not an unreasonable thing to do since they are pandering to their base in the Arab world in this case vs wanting to sound reasonable to English-language countries so as to make money in the English-speaking world.

EDIT: Actually, I stated the above paragraph poorly. If I'm going to call one thing pandering to the Arab world, I should also have called the other pandering to the English speaking world. Again, not unreasonable since it is a for-profit organization.

Was it at one time subsidized by one of the Arab governments? I seem to remember reading that as well.
 
phinds said:
I very recently started watching Al Jazeera's live English language news feed and I have now been shocked twice.

The following is based on a relatively small amount of information/evidence and that is the reason for the question at the end of this.

First, I was absolutely amazed to find that the program seems to be as even-handed as the BBC in its reporting. ...

This isn't so shocking if you know the history of Al Jazeera. The origin of Al Jazeera is the BBC. When they cut back on their staff in the Middle East, Al Jazeera stood up as a news organization and hired most of the BBC staff that had been cut.

They have a very good history prior to 9/11, reporting on Middle East issues ignored by the rest of the world (they were essentially the only news organization reporting on events in Afghanistan prior to the US invasion for example). They still have a good history of news reporting, but broadcasting things such as bin Laden's statements and some other items unfavorable to the US has put them in an unfavorable light among the American mainstream.

The have more independence than any other news organization in the Middle East (with other Middle East news organizations mostly being government owned/controlled) and really do serve the interest of Middle East viewers.
 
  • #10
Bobbywhy said:
I am an American and have been reading Al Jazeera's English news website for approximately two years. I find its reporting usually quite honest and well-balanced. In fact, as for the Middle East, (where I have lived for seven years) it often gives a more accurate picture of events than any other news source. Of course there are opinion pieces, and some pretty far out, but Al Jazeera clearly marks Opinion from News. I follow BBC, Reuters, and several more hoping for an accurate picture. I consider Al Jazeera an essential ingredient for part of the total coverage of news. Also, reading its editorials and opinion pieces gives us a viewpoint not found anywhere else. It is up to you to gather news from a variety of sources, sum them together with your values, and then decide what to believe.

I, too, read http://english.aljazeera.net/" for much the same reasons as you do. And I agree, I don't notice much of a slant in the "hard news" stories, but the opinion pieces certainly have a different perspective from what you'll find in much of the western press.

But AJE covers many, many stories that simply can't be found in other places. For example, they haven't let go of the events in Syria - it frequently makes the top of the news. But in much of the western press, coverage is spotty at best.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
I haven't been too up on the news lately but in my opinion, you could slap the BBC or ... hmm, I seem to be trying to think of a fairly factual news organization from the US and am drawing a blank. Anyhow, you could slap the BBC symbol on everything I've seen off Al Jazeera and I wouldn't know the difference.
 
  • #12
Pengwuino said:
I haven't been too up on the news lately but in my opinion, you could slap the BBC or ... hmm, I seem to be trying to think of a fairly factual news organization from the US and am drawing a blank. Anyhow, you could slap the BBC symbol on everything I've seen off Al Jazeera and I wouldn't know the difference.

Yes, that's been my opinion as well, which is why my first shock was one of delight but the second was one of dismay.
 
  • #13
Thanks rootX.

Well, let's go back to the thread topic then, is Al Jezeera America tv news reliable, I'd say yes.
 
  • #14
Evo said:
Thanks rootX.

Well, let's go back to the thread topic then, is Al Jezeera America tv news reliable, I'd say yes.

Yep, seems to be, although I'd be more comfortable with them if their opinion pieces were not so biased.

I watch MSNBC and FOX and I DO find Al Jazeera TV to be more even-handed than either of them.
 
  • #15
phinds said:
Yep, seems to be, although I'd be more comfortable with them if their opinion pieces were not so biased.

I watch MSNBC and FOX and I DO find Al Jazeera TV to be more even-handed than either of them.

That's not hard to do. You almost have to put on some mental armor to protect yourself before watching either of those two channels (except for Chris Matthews and Joe Scarborough - I like both of those shows).
 
  • #16
Pengwuino said:
I haven't been too up on the news lately but in my opinion, you could slap the BBC...symbol on everything I've seen off Al Jazeera and I wouldn't know the difference.

Thats my impression too, though until I read this post I had never read the AJE website. Had a quick glance and it looks like a reliable, objective source. Years back BBC Radio News started quoting Al Jazeera as a reliable source, like they would Reuters, for instance. They don't ssem to now, possibly because of events mentioned in this thread. Will definitiely be taking a regular look to see if my initial thoughts pan out.
 
  • #17
This thread keeps getting hijacked, so it is closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
12K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K