Question about Alexander and Briggs notation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ComputerGeek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
ComputerGeek
Messages
383
Reaction score
0
I am writing a small paper on Knot Theory for my undergrad geometry course and I have a question about the tabulation of knots.

The books I have discuss the different notations, except for the ALexander and Briggs notation, which is used in the tables provided in the appendices.

I believe I understand the notation, but I want to be sure.

[tex]4_1[/tex] which refers to the figure eight knot means that this is the first knot of the class of knots that has 4 crossings that cannot be undone by Reidemeister moves. correct? If that is the case, then in the set of knots with 8 fundamental crossings, is there any significance to their ordering in the table? could I take [tex]8_1[/tex] and [tex]8_2[/tex] and just switch their corresponding knots? also, on some of the knots, there is a superscript. what is the significance of that?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In my book (Adams), the superscripts refer to the number of components in the link. I think the subscript is just a historical ordering. For more tables, see the Knot Atlas.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K