Question about double slit experiment

In summary: This is what led to the idea of a double slit experiment with them, to see if their wave properties would change.
  • #1
florin3k3
9
0
i've always been curious...WHY did somebody come up with the experiment? why did they think anything special would happen? hope this doesn't sound stupid :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I assume you mean the double slit experiment with electrons? The double slit experiment with photons seems kind of obvious, especially given how long the wave-particle nature of light debate had been going on. Extending it to electrons seems sort of natural in that light, I think (no pun intended).
 
  • #3
whybother said:
I assume you mean the double slit experiment with electrons? The double slit experiment with photons seems kind of obvious, especially given how long the wave-particle nature of light debate had been going on. Extending it to electrons seems sort of natural in that light, I think (no pun intended).

yes, electrons.
 
  • #4
Double slit with electrons wasn't actually done until the 1960s... so there was certainly enough quantum mechanics on the books already to suggest something very weird would happen.
 
  • #5
this may sound stupid as well, but what would be the difference between a double-slit experiment involving electrons as opposed to photons? would the wave form be any different? do electrons and photons have different tendencies as to where they would appear during a quantum leap?
 
  • #6
There are many big difference between photons and electrons... classically, photons are expected to product an interference pattern in the double slit experiment as classically they are waves. Electrons, on the other hand, are classically particles... with mass and other properties... making them very different from photons.

Classically, the two would have incredibly different results, since an electron shouldn't be able to interfere with itself if it's just a particle.

Actually though, the experiments look very similar... I don't know what you mean by "tendencies" though... but if you allow the experiments to run for a long time/with lots of photons or electrons, they'll basically look the same (interference patterns on the screen, that is)
 
  • #7
whybother said:
Double slit with electrons wasn't actually done until the 1960s... so there was certainly enough quantum mechanics on the books already to suggest something very weird would happen.

so it was first with photons then electrons? but still, how come they thought of exactly a double slit experiment?! I'm not any good at physics or quantum emchanics so what I'm asking might have an obvious answer. it just sounds weird that a person could think to himself - if i send electrons throught 2 slits, so and so might happen- then one at a time etc... again, i have a very small understanding in this field so don't laugh :) why did he think that something odd would occur with electrons? from what i gather it was quite astonishing even for people that work in the field so it wasn't somethink they thought would happen.
 
  • #8
thanks!

yeah sorry, maybe i should have been a bit more clear there. what i meant was basically whether or not the electrons and photons could interfere with themselves, thus changing their probabilities to pass through one slit or the other.
 
  • #9
Historically, there was a debate as to the nature of light, whether it was a particle... like a rock... or a wave... more like water.

When a flat water wave goes between one slit, it comes out again as a circular wave - this was easily observed. When water would pass through a double slit, it would come out as two waves and interfere- as interference is a thing waves do. They knew this about waves for a long time, so when asking if light was a wave, testing to see if it interfered with itself in a double slit type set up was a fairly obvious choice. Double slits probably just occurred naturally and were observed with water, so it was just a natural choice for light.

The double slit experiment was a long time thought experiment in quantum mechanics even before they were actually able to preform it in the 1960s. People expected the results when they happened.

de Broglie did theoretical work in the early 1900s on "matter-waves" - Light was already accepted/thought of as a wave and a partcile. De Broglie suggested that was true for electrons (and everything else really) too, but being able to describe an associated wave length with material objects (similar the the fact that light has a wave length). If electrons have a wavelength, then they must also have some wave properties, like self interference.

Yes, wave-particle duality of matter was really weird at the time. Not by the 60s though.
 
  • #10
physics_boi95 said:
thanks!

yeah sorry, maybe i should have been a bit more clear there. what i meant was basically whether or not the electrons and photons could interfere with themselves, thus changing their probabilities to pass through one slit or the other.

Photons and electrons both interfere with themselves, part of their "wave nature".
 
  • #11
whybother said:
Historically, there was a debate as to the nature of light, whether it was a particle... like a rock... or a wave... more like water.

When a flat water wave goes between one slit, it comes out again as a circular wave - this was easily observed. When water would pass through a double slit, it would come out as two waves and interfere- as interference is a thing waves do. They knew this about waves for a long time, so when asking if light was a wave, testing to see if it interfered with itself in a double slit type set up was a fairly obvious choice. Double slits probably just occurred naturally and were observed with water, so it was just a natural choice for light.

The double slit experiment was a long time thought experiment in quantum mechanics even before they were actually able to preform it in the 1960s. People expected the results when they happened.

de Broglie did theoretical work in the early 1900s on "matter-waves" - Light was already accepted/thought of as a wave and a partcile. De Broglie suggested that was true for electrons (and everything else really) too, but being able to describe an associated wave length with material objects (similar the the fact that light has a wave length). If electrons have a wavelength, then they must also have some wave properties, like self interference.

Yes, wave-particle duality of matter was really weird at the time. Not by the 60s though.

thanks for taking the time to make it clear for me. really appreciate it.
 
  • #13
yeah, thanks. that helped me out a lot too.
 
  • #14
- Indeed, the wave nature of the light was very much expressed by Young’s double slit experiment.
- Einstein explained the photoelectric effect by suggesting that light is made of particles (the photons). Before that, Plank realized that energy is made of discrete packets. Bohr proposed a quantum model of the atom, where photons (having discrete energies) are emitted by electrons jumping from an “orbit” to another. The corpuscular nature of the photon required reinterpretation of Young’s double slit experiment. The photons are particles which interfere like waves. This looked weird at that time, and still does.
- de Broglie explained Bohr’s quantization conditions for the electrons in the atoms by the condition that the electrons are also waves, and that they oscillate an integral number of times while going on the orbit around the nucleus (reminding of resonance of musical instruments).
- there were made experiments with electrons, by Davisson and Germer in 1927, showing diffraction exactly as predicted by their (theoretical, until then) wavelike nature.
- then, of course, the two slit experiment with electrons.

The reason is that physicists wanted to see how deep can push the wave nature of matter. The same reason led them to test interference with molecules consisting on 60 atoms of Carbon (buckyballs).

And they would do this with cats too, if they could :smile:
 

1. What is the double slit experiment?

The double slit experiment is a classic experiment in physics that demonstrates the wave-particle duality of light and matter. It involves shining a beam of particles or light through two parallel slits and observing the resulting interference pattern on a screen.

2. Who first performed the double slit experiment?

The double slit experiment was first performed by English physicist Thomas Young in the early 1800s. However, the experiment was later refined and popularized by physicist Thomas Young in the early 1900s.

3. What is the purpose of the double slit experiment?

The purpose of the double slit experiment is to demonstrate the wave-like behavior of particles and the particle-like behavior of waves. It also helps to illustrate the concept of superposition, where waves can interact and interfere with each other.

4. Can the double slit experiment be performed with different types of particles?

Yes, the double slit experiment can be performed with various types of particles, such as electrons, photons, and even molecules. However, the results may vary depending on the properties of the particles used.

5. What are the implications of the double slit experiment?

The double slit experiment has significant implications in the field of quantum mechanics, as it challenges our understanding of the fundamental nature of particles and waves. It also has practical applications, such as in the development of advanced technologies like electron microscopy and quantum computing.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
813
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
38
Views
692
Replies
26
Views
1K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
737
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
933
Replies
60
Views
2K
Replies
42
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
1K
Back
Top