Question About Exact Differential Form

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 2K views
Messages
23,209
Reaction score
7,696
My book is going through a proof on exact differential forms and the test to see if they're exact, and I'm lost on one part of it.

It says:

If $$M(x,y)dx + N(x,y)dy = \frac{\partial F}{\partial x}dx + \frac{\partial F}{\partial y}dy$$ then the calculus theorem concerning the equality of continuous mixed partial derivatives $$\frac{\partial }{\partial y}\frac{\partial F}{\partial x}=\frac{\partial }{\partial x}\frac{\partial F}{\partial y}$$ would dictate a "compatibility condition" on the functions ##M## and ##N##: $$\frac{\partial}{\partial y}M(x,y)=\frac{\partial}{\partial x}N(x,y)$$

What does this mean? What is the "calculus theorem concerning the equality of continuous mixed partial derivatives" it talks about?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the calculus theorem says that if F has 2 continuous partial derivatives then ∂^2F/∂x∂y = ∂^2F/∂y∂x. Thus a necessary condition for M to equal ∂F/∂x and for N to equal ∂F/∂y, is that we must have ∂M/∂y = ∂^2F/∂x∂y = d^2F/∂y∂x = ∂N/∂x.
 
So, this is basically saying that given a function ##F(x,y)##, the 2nd order mixed partial derivatives of that function are equal even if you flip the order in which you take the derivatives?

If so, then the compatibility condition that ##\frac{\partial M}{\partial y}=\frac{\partial N}{\partial x}## makes sense.
It helps when you understand what a 2nd order mixed partial derivative is. :rolleyes:
 
the theorem does not say that the second order partials must always be equal in both orders, but it does hold if they are continuous. i.e. there do exist functions whose second order partials exist but are not continuous, and then the mixed order partials do not need to be equal.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42
If the 2nd order mixed partials are not continuous, I assume the theorem is still true over the range in which they are continuous?
 
Drakkith said:
If the 2nd order mixed partials are not continuous, I assume the theorem is still true over the range in which they are continuous?
Yes, because differentiability as well as continuity are local properties. If you narrow down the domain to an open neighborhood where the conditions are met, the theorem is applicable.