I can find various derivations of ∫ dθ = 0 which are satisfactory, but none of ∫dθ θ =1.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Cheng and Li says it's just a normalization convention, of course that assumes that the integral is finite.

Is this just a matter of definition, or is there a better reason that that?

And would any of this relate to the exterior calculus, since I believe Grassmann algebra is an example of (or is) exterior albegra.

Thanks very much !

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Question about Grassmann Integral

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**