Question about definite and indefinite integrals

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jonjacson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Indefinite Integrals
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of definite and indefinite integrals in calculus, exploring their definitions, geometric interpretations, and the relationship between them. Participants examine the implications of using the same symbol for both types of integrals and consider how one might compute an indefinite integral without relying on the fundamental theorem of calculus.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the definite integral represents the area under a curve between two points, while the indefinite integral is a function whose derivative is the original function.
  • There is a question about why the same symbol is used for both definite and indefinite integrals, with some suggesting that they are fundamentally related.
  • One participant proposes calculating the indefinite integral using the definite integral from 0 to x, raising questions about the geometric interpretation of the indefinite integral.
  • Another participant mentions that the indefinite integral can be viewed as a function that provides the definite integral between two points, emphasizing that any function whose derivative equals the original function qualifies as an indefinite integral.
  • Some participants discuss the area represented by the indefinite integral, noting that it can provide values for specific points but does not directly represent the rate of change.
  • There are mentions of the Risch Algorithm as a method of interest, particularly in the context of evaluating integrals.
  • One participant highlights the distinction between evaluating definite integrals and finding an indefinite integral, suggesting that the two processes can yield different levels of complexity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement on various points, particularly regarding the interpretations and implications of definite and indefinite integrals. Some concepts remain contested, and no consensus is reached on the best approach to understanding or calculating indefinite integrals without the fundamental theorem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the discussion involves assumptions about the definitions of integrals and the geometric interpretations, which may not be universally agreed upon. The complexity of evaluating integrals also introduces limitations in the discussion.

jonjacson
Messages
450
Reaction score
38
First, just to check, I write what I think and let me know if I am wrong:

The definite integral of a function gives us a number whose geometric meaning is the area under the curve between two limiting points.
We can calculate this integral as the limit of the sum of the rectangles and the integral symbol means a sum over all rectangles.

The indefinite integral of the function f(x) is the function primitive F(x) whose derivative is f(x), and here we are using the fundamental theorem of calculus. Why do we use the same symbol?

My question is, How could we calculate the indefinite integral without the fundamental theorem?

Could we try it using the definite integral between the limits 0 and x?

From a geometric point of view, How could we talk about the indefinite integral?

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
jonjacson said:
Why do we use the same symbol?
Because basically it's the same thing. Compare using the same term ##\sin ## for the sine function and for the value of the sine function at some point ##x##.
jonjacson said:
How could we calculate the indefinite integral without the fundamental theorem?
We could create a table of F values from the sum of rectangle areas, but we would still need to state where we start integrating (i.e. the table would list ##F(x)-F(x_{\rm start}## ). So: Yes to your
jonjacson said:
Could we try it using the definite integral between the limits 0 and x?
Note: this doesn't give you a function in the from of a 'recipe', though.
jonjacson said:
From a geometric point of view, How could we talk about the indefinite integral?
It tells you how the area under the curve varies with the independent variable
 
jonjacson said:
First, just to check, I write what I think and let me know if I am wrong:

The definite integral of a function gives us a number whose geometric meaning is the area under the curve between two limiting points.
We can calculate this integral as the limit of the sum of the rectangles and the integral symbol means a sum over all rectangles.

The indefinite integral of the function f(x) is the function primitive F(x) whose derivative is f(x), and here we are using the fundamental theorem of calculus. Why do we use the same symbol?

My question is, How could we calculate the indefinite integral without the fundamental theorem?

Could we try it using the definite integral between the limits 0 and x?

From a geometric point of view, How could we talk about the indefinite integral?

Thanks!

You seem to be largely answering your own questions here. The only thing I would add is that you could see ##F## as a function which gives you definite integral between two points:

##\int_{a}^{b}f(x)dx = F(b) - F(a)##

And, it turns out that any ##F## where ##F' = f## does the job. And, you call any such ##F## an indefinite integral of ##f##. More precisely, the set of functions ##\lbrace F: F' = f \rbrace## is the indefinite integral.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
BvU said:
Because basically it's the same thing. Compare using the same term ##\sin ## for the sine function and for the value of the sine function at some point ##x##.
We could create a table of F values from the sum of rectangle areas, but we would still need to state where we start integrating (i.e. the table would list ##F(x)-F(x_{\rm start}## ). So: Yes to your
Note: this doesn't give you a function in the from of a 'recipe', though.
It tells you how the area under the curve varies with the independent variable

The indefinite integral gives you the area (if you substitute for particular values), not the rate of change of the area, which is the function itself right?
PeroK said:
You seem to be largely answering your own questions here. The only thing I would add is that you could see ##F## as a function which gives you definite integral between two points:

##\int_{a}^{b}f(x)dx = F(b) - F(a)##

And, it turns out that any ##F## where ##F' = f## does the job. And, you call any such ##F## an indefinite integral of ##f##. More precisely, the set of functions ##\lbrace F: F' = f \rbrace## is the indefinite integral.

THanks.
 
jonjacson said:
The indefinite integral gives you the area (if you substitute for particular values), not the rate of change of the area, which is the function itself right?
Yes.
Example: constant function. Indefinite integral: x itself, linear function. Area changes linearly with the independent variable.
 
BvU said:
Yes.
Example: constant function. Indefinite integral: x itself, linear function. Area changes linearly with the independent variable.
I think there was a misinterpretation.

When you talked about changed linearly, you talked about the diferent values a function primitive F(x) can take, I thought you meant its rate of change F'(x) , that is why I said the rate of change was the funcion f(x) itself.

I guess!
 
Just to add to the confusion: In many cases it is possible to evaluate the definite integral but not the indefinite...
 
pwsnafu said:
You might be interested in the Risch Algorithm.
Very interesting yes.
Svein said:
Just to add to the confusion: In many cases it is possible to evaluate the definite integral but not the indefinite...

I understand that. Finding an area is different to finding a function whose differential is a given one.

Have I told you anything confusing?
 
  • #10
jonjacson said:
Have I told you anything confusing?
Just an expression. Means: "This information that was not asked for and may not be very relevant"
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K