Question about looking back in time

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kleinma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on how telescopes like Hubble observe distant galaxies, revealing their appearance as they were millions or billions of years ago due to the time it takes for light to travel. Observers receive images of where galaxies used to be, not their current positions, as the universe expands. The Hubble law distance, also known as "comoving distance," is utilized to plot galaxies as they are believed to be now, avoiding a mix of various past epochs. The Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) provides a snapshot of the universe approximately 300,000 years post-Big Bang, illustrating the universe's early state.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Hubble law and comoving distance
  • Familiarity with the concept of light travel time in cosmology
  • Basic knowledge of the Big Bang theory and cosmic expansion
  • Awareness of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) and its significance
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the Hubble law and its implications for distance measurement in cosmology
  • Learn about the Cosmic Microwave Background and its role in understanding the early universe
  • Investigate the use of redshift (z) in calculating distances to celestial objects
  • Review Ned Wright's tutorials on cosmology for visual aids and further explanations
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy enthusiasts, cosmologists, students of astrophysics, and anyone interested in understanding the mechanics of cosmic observation and the structure of the universe.

kleinma
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
Ok I was thinking about this the other day...

When telescopes like Hubble look at distant galaxies, it is really seeing them how they were x amount of millions/billions of years ago because that is how long it took for the light from those galaxies to reach the telescope.. Right?

Now if the universe is expanding, and said galaxies are moving farther away from us, then are we getting images of where the galaxy used to be? or where it is now? How does that work? Do we plot where these galaxies are in relation to where they are in the telescope shots we get? Or in relation to where we believe they are now (based on our estimated speeds of the expanding universe, and the speed the galaxy is moving away from us..

Also, If the universe started with a big bang, and was tiny and has been since expanding... looking back in time should show a smaller universe (i know we haven't seen an "end" of the universe.. but theoretically, shouldn't everything from billions of years ago that we see how be a lot closer together??)

oww my head hurts

someone clear this up for me??
 
Space news on Phys.org
The clearest answers on the web to these questions (with easy to understand diagrams) are at the UCLA website of a guy named Ned Wright who teaches cosmology there---he is also a member of the team that put the MAP satellite up to take the most accurate to date look at the Cosmic Microwave Background.

Wright is unusual in that he is highly qualified but also really gifted and motivated as an explainer at the beginner-level.

http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html

Various ideas of distance are used. There is a "present moment" distance that takes into account the expansion of the universe since the light left. There is also a "light travel time" distance based on the estimated time it took to come here. And a couple of other main ones.

The "CosmoCalculator" at one of those links will calculate the various distances for you if you give it the redshift of the object.

Put in the redshift (z) and press "flat"----which assumes spatial flatness, the prevailing view. It will make adjustments for cosmological constant and so on.

The FAQ at the site are interesting. Wright's students must ask a lot of questions.

Have a look at the tutorial---it has four pages, several of which have good diagrams. It isn't perfect and it looks unfinished, but it is a lot more pictorial and accessible than other stuff I've found on the web.

Have fun.

Originally posted by kleinma
Ok I was thinking about this the other day...

When telescopes like Hubble look at distant galaxies, it is really seeing them how they were x amount of millions/billions of years ago because that is how long it took for the light from those galaxies to reach the telescope.. Right?

Now if the universe is expanding, and said galaxies are moving farther away from us, then are we getting images of where the galaxy used to be? or where it is now? How does that work? Do we plot where these galaxies are in relation to where they are in the telescope shots we get? Or in relation to where we believe they are now (based on our estimated speeds of the expanding universe, and the speed the galaxy is moving away from us..

Also, If the universe started with a big bang, and was tiny and has been since expanding... looking back in time should show a smaller universe (i know we haven't seen an "end" of the universe.. but theoretically, shouldn't everything from billions of years ago that we see how be a lot closer together??)

oww my head hurts

someone clear this up for me??
 
Originally posted by kleinma
Ok I was thinking about this the other day...

When telescopes like Hubble look at distant galaxies, it is really seeing them how they were x amount of millions/billions of years ago because that is how long it took for the light from those galaxies to reach the telescope.. Right?

Right.


Now if the universe is expanding, and said galaxies are moving farther away from us, then are we getting images of where the galaxy used to be? or where it is now?

Where it used to be.


How does that work? Do we plot where these galaxies are in relation to where they are in the telescope shots we get? Or in relation to where we believe they are now (based on our estimated speeds of the expanding universe, and the speed the galaxy is moving away from us..

They are normally plotted using the Hubble law distance which is their distance at the present moment as seen by observers at rest with respect to the expansion of the universe---also called the "comoving distance". It gives a snapshot of the universe as it is believed to be now---not at a mishmash of various times in the past.

Plotting by "light travel time" distance would give you a plot that is a mishmash of various past epochs at various stages of expansion. And the light travel time distance is not compatible with the Hubble distance law---v = H0 D----which is basic to the subject. The Hubble law refers to the present moment.

Also, If the universe started with a big bang, and was tiny and has been since expanding... looking back in time should show a smaller universe (i know we haven't seen an "end" of the universe.. but theoretically, shouldn't everything from billions of years ago that we see how be a lot closer together??)

oww my head hurts

What was in a very small volume has been expanded out and is all around us.

The light that came from that small volume is now coming from all directions.

There are good diagrams of this in Wright's tutorial---especially page 3.

The whole-sky picture of the CMB-----that blue and red mottled oval you often see----is a snapshot of the earliest light we can see and gives a baby picture of our portion of the universe.

It is not from the very beginning but from some 300 thousand years after the bang----when things cooled down enough so the hot plasma turned transparent and didnt block the light. So that mottled oval is how it looked then.

Of course expanded out so it is all around us.

Look at the tutorial and enjoy!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K