Question about movement in isolated system

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of forces and motion in isolated systems, specifically addressing why rockets and guns can move despite internal forces seemingly canceling each other out. Participants explore concepts of momentum conservation, Newton's laws, and the distinction between isolated and non-isolated systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that in an isolated system, internal forces cancel each other out, questioning why rockets and guns can still move.
  • Another participant clarifies that rockets and guns are not isolated systems when considering the ejected fuel or bullets, which exert forces that lead to motion.
  • A participant asserts that conservation laws apply even when momentum is zero, indicating that momentum remains conserved unless acted upon by external forces.
  • Some participants emphasize that the center of mass of the complete system (including ejected materials) does not change, maintaining that internal forces do not affect the overall momentum of the system.
  • There is a discussion about how forces acting on different objects do not cancel out, as forces exerted by the rocket's exhaust or the bullet do not balance with forces acting on the gun.
  • One participant expresses confusion about how velocity can appear if forces are balanced, questioning the explanation for movement in these scenarios.
  • Another participant points out that external forces are necessary for the car to move, contrasting it with the rocket and gun scenarios where external forces from ejected materials are present.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus, as there are multiple competing views regarding the nature of isolated systems and the role of internal versus external forces in producing motion.

Contextual Notes

Limitations in the discussion include varying definitions of isolated systems, assumptions about internal versus external forces, and the complexity of momentum conservation in different contexts.

  • #31
The "parts" inside an isolated system are not isolated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Kenan said:
If forces will be acting on the same object then there will be no motion,but in gun or rocket case forces are not acting on the same object,no?
Depends on how you define the objects. You can consider Münchausen as arm & body to have two objects as well. Then analyze the forces between them to see what is actually different compared to gun & bullet.
 
  • #33
Doc Al said:
OK.An object will accelerate (begin to move) if there is an unbalanced force acting on it. It the case of the bullet fired from a gun, there is an unbalanced force acting on the bullet as it begins moving.His hair won't move since it is attached to his head! (If he really pulls it, it could tear off though.) And his body won't move because whatever force he pulls up with (on his hair) is balanced by the equal and opposite force that the hair pulls down with.

Always ask yourself: Is there a net force on an object? If so, it will accelerate. If not, it won't.

Ok I think I understand you,in the Münhausen example net force is zero because forces are acting on the same object.In the rocket/gun example both are moving because net force is not zero - forces are acting on different objects.Am I right now?
 
  • #34
Kenan said:
Ok I think I understand you,in the Münhausen example net force is zero because forces are acting on the same object.In the rocket/gun example both are moving because net force is not zero - forces are acting on different objects.Am I right now?

I hope I'm right now,correct me if I'm wrong.
Thanks again.
 
  • #35
Kenan said:
Ok I think I understand you,in the Münhausen example net force is zero because forces are acting on the same object.In the rocket/gun example both are moving because net force is not zero - forces are acting on different objects.Am I right now?
Close enough.

Have you read this page from the website you linked?: What's[/PLAIN] an object and what isn't?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kenan
  • #36
Kenan said:
Ok I think I understand you,in the Münhausen example net force is zero because forces are acting on the same object.In the rocket/gun example both are moving because net force is not zero - forces are acting on different objects.Am I right now?
Yes. The net force on each 'piece' of the system is zero in the first example and non-zero in the rocket/gun example.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K