Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Question about naive questions

  1. Jan 15, 2009 #1
    Lets say that someone (I see it happens quite often) is asking "How photon can go thru 2 slits at the same time?" or "How electron can be a particle and wave at the same time?"

    What is a right way to answer such questions? It is correct to give answers based on the Copenhagen? Or may be we should tell about other interpretations?

    PRO: historically the first interpretation.
    PRO: may the the simplest? (this is controversual)
    PRO: It is so complicated that after an information about multiple interpreations people can get absolutely lost.
    CON: people can be stuck with the very first interpretation thet are given
    CON: due to non-local nature of WF collapse people tend to ask more and more questions about ETL etc - so may be Copenhagen is the simplest one but not the best one? (this is controversual)
    CON: Do we have a right to hide a truth, a right of not giving a choice to chose 'their' interpretation?

    What do you think?
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 16, 2009 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Dmitry, if you visit my blog, you will see one possible way how such questions can be answered.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Threads - Question naive questions Date
I Question about charge Mar 14, 2018
Naive question: Macroscopic implications of quantum probability Oct 27, 2014
A Naive Question Dec 17, 2013
Naive Entanglement Question Aug 27, 2013
Naive Feynman diagram question Aug 3, 2006