Question about naive questions

  • Thread starter Dmitry67
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses the best approach to answering questions about the dual nature of particles, specifically the phenomena of photons going through two slits simultaneously and electrons being both particles and waves. The Copenhagen interpretation is suggested as the most historically significant and simplest explanation, but there are also other interpretations that could be considered. Some argue that presenting multiple interpretations can be confusing, while others argue that it is important to give people a choice and not hide the truth. The conversation ends by mentioning a possible way to answer these types of questions on a blog.
  • #1
Dmitry67
2,567
1
Lets say that someone (I see it happens quite often) is asking "How photon can go thru 2 slits at the same time?" or "How electron can be a particle and wave at the same time?"

What is a right way to answer such questions? It is correct to give answers based on the Copenhagen? Or may be we should tell about other interpretations?

Copanhagen:
PRO: historically the first interpretation.
PRO: may the the simplest? (this is controversual)
PRO: It is so complicated that after an information about multiple interpreations people can get absolutely lost.
CON: people can be stuck with the very first interpretation thet are given
CON: due to non-local nature of WF collapse people tend to ask more and more questions about ETL etc - so may be Copenhagen is the simplest one but not the best one? (this is controversual)
CON: Do we have a right to hide a truth, a right of not giving a choice to chose 'their' interpretation?

What do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Dmitry, if you visit my blog, you will see one possible way how such questions can be answered.
 
  • #3


it is important to approach questions about quantum mechanics with an open mind and to consider multiple interpretations. The Copenhagen interpretation is a valid and historically significant interpretation, but it is not the only one. It is important to educate individuals about the different interpretations and allow them to come to their own understanding and interpretation of the phenomena.

One way to answer these questions is to provide a brief overview of the Copenhagen interpretation and then mention other interpretations, such as the Many-Worlds interpretation or the Pilot-Wave theory. This allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the complexity of quantum mechanics and allows individuals to explore different interpretations and come to their own conclusions.

It is not our role as scientists to hide the truth or limit individuals to a single interpretation. We should provide information and resources for individuals to explore and understand the different interpretations of quantum mechanics. This not only promotes critical thinking and understanding, but also allows for further advancements and developments in the field.
 

What is a naive question?

A naive question is a question that may seem simple or basic, but is not fully understood by the person asking it. It often reveals a lack of knowledge or understanding on a particular topic.

Why is it important to ask naive questions?

Asking naive questions can lead to a deeper understanding of a topic. It can also help to identify any gaps in knowledge and allow for further learning and growth.

How can I encourage others to ask naive questions?

Creating a safe and non-judgmental environment can encourage others to ask naive questions. It is important to listen and provide helpful responses rather than dismissing or belittling their questions.

Are there any benefits to asking naive questions?

Yes, asking naive questions can lead to critical thinking and problem-solving skills. It can also promote open communication and foster a collaborative learning environment.

Can asking too many naive questions be a bad thing?

While asking naive questions can be beneficial, it is important to balance it with actively seeking out answers and conducting research. Constantly asking basic questions without putting in effort to learn can be counterproductive.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
742
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
24
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
7
Replies
225
Views
10K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
89
Views
6K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
839
Replies
3
Views
819
  • General Discussion
6
Replies
190
Views
9K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
886
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top