Question about Planetary orbit and satelites

  • Thread starter Thread starter teggenspiller
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbit Planetary
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the orbital period of a satellite around the Earth. The satellite has a mass of 9.0 × 10^3 kg and orbits at a distance of 2.56 × 10^7 m from the Earth's surface. Participants are exploring the application of Kepler's laws and gravitational equations to determine the period of the satellite's orbit.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to apply Kepler's Third Law but are questioning the correct use of variables, particularly the mass of the satellite versus the mass of the Earth. There is confusion regarding the correct radius to use for calculations, whether to include the Earth's radius or not. Some participants express uncertainty about the relevance of the satellite's mass in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their attempts and calculations. Some have pointed out potential errors in the equations used and have encouraged others to check their calculations. There is a recognition that the mass of the satellite does not affect the period, leading to further exploration of why this information was provided. Multiple interpretations of the problem setup are being considered.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may impose specific requirements on how to approach the problem. There is an emphasis on understanding the relationships between the variables involved in orbital mechanics.

teggenspiller
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
1. The pro blem statement, all variables and given/known data
the question:
9.0 × 10^3 kg satellite orbits the Earth at the distance of 2.56 × 10^7 m from Earth’s surface. What is its period?
They give me a multiple choice, but let's figure this out without it.

okay so my variables known are the mass of the satelite:
"MSat"- 9.0*10^3
d/r= 2.56 × 10^7 m
mearth: 5.9742 × 10^24 kilograms
G= 6.67*10^-11


Homework Equations


Kepler's Law (?)
T^2= 2*pi*r(^3/2)/G*Mp


The Attempt at a Solution


So for some reason I bet that equation is NOT correct. I've been searching all over google and through my notes and its all i can come up with. I'm not sure if I use the mass of the satelite or the mass of Earth in the equation. I don't understand why they would even give me the mass of the satelite if I am not supposed to use it though
so I put into my calculator: T=squrt: 2*(3.14)^2* 2.56 × 10^7 m (or is it the radius of earth+the distance given(?) / (6.67*10^-11)* 5.9742 × 10^24
or do i use the mass of satelite here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equation in #2 has a typo. It should be,

[tex] T^2 = \frac{4 \pi^2 r^3}{GM}[/tex]

This is Kepler's Third Law, which may help with Googling. See if you can find what you are supposed to plug in for r and M on your own. One hint:

I don't understand why they would even give me the mass of the satelite if I am not supposed to use it though

Yes, you're right, physics problems never give you extra information just to screw with you.
 
well, when you put it like that...:)
 
i used your equation. i used the satelite for mass. i tried the radius as the radius given AND the radius give+the radius of Earth itself, neither time did i get an answer even close
 
& the period of a satellite does NOT depend on its mass, so why in the world would they give me its mass?
 
Let's figure out the radius first. Our two options are the height itself, or the height plus the planetary radius. Which one is right?

Hint: if there was no atmosphere, satellites could orbit at ground level (if there were no mountains, people, etc to get in their way). Which option makes sense in that context?
 
option B
 
using your equation:
(sqrt(4 * (pi^2)) * (2.56 * (10^7))) + (((6 378.1^3) / (6.67 * (10^11))) * (5.9742 * (10^24))) = 2.32395597 × 10^24

all of my options' powers of ten are 4.
i don't see how/where I am going wrong.

Using the mass as the satellites mass

(sqrt(4 * (pi^2)) * (2.56 * (10^7))) + (((6 378.1^3) / (6.67 * (10^11))) * (9 * (10^3))) = 160 853 045 <---wrong as well.
hmm.:/
 
Yup. And that's a general result; outside of a spherical body, the gravitational force from that body is the same as if all the mass was concentrated at the center. So in this kind of problem, r always means "distance from the center."

Now for the mass. Why did they give you both masses? To make you think about this question!

If you're still stuck, drop a textbook* and a pencil from the same height and see which one falls faster.

*Not a physics book. Drop a math or chemistry book, that's all they're good for. :biggrin:Edit: Looks like you have an order-of-operations error. Slow down and make sure you're putting the numbers into the calculator correctly.
 
  • #10
okay, okay. i see. So why arent my 'generally correct' results = any of my choices?

by the way, they hit the ground at precisely the same time.
 
  • #11
by the way, they hit the ground at precisely the same time.

Yes. So does motion in a gravitational field depend on the mass of the falling object?

(Also, I checked the answer and got [something] times 104 seconds. So it does work out.)
 
  • #12
no it does not. just how far it is away from the mcenter, i suppose.

:) well thank you for the help
 
  • #13
I think you might just be making calculator errors. Can you show me what you're entering in?

Two things:

1. Make sure you are really dividing by the denominator.

2. The equation above has T^2 on the LHS. So you have to take the square root at the end to get T.
 
  • #14
i using those equations from above.

along with endless variations of it. including an equation of velocity, (v=sqrt(G*m^2)/R, as in distance from center, like you said.

then inserting value of v into T=2piR/V
which is a random equation I found in my notes. I am so lost.
 
  • #15
what you're saying makes sence, i just don't get how to apply it.
 
  • #16
Those two equations are actually how you derive my equation at the top. So let's look at those. It's a good idea to know how equations are related. So, we have:

Fg = GMm/r2

Where F is the force of gravity, G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the planet, m is the mass of the satellite, and r is the distance between the satellite and the center of the planet. This is the fundamental equation that describes gravity.

Now, imagine a particle moving in a circle. You have to exert a force to keep it moving in a circle, otherwise it flies off in a straight line. That force is,

Fcircle = mv2/r

For a satellite, gravity is the force that keeps the satellite moving in a circle. So we should set the two forces equal to get,

mv2/r = GMm/r2

We can divide both sides by m to get and multiply both sides by r to get,

v2 = GM/r

(Notice the mass of the satellite is gone, as expected).

Okay, now to introduce the orbital period. The circumference of a circle is:

[tex] c = 2 \pi r[/tex]

And speed v is distance divided by time. The time it takes to complete on circle is T, by definition. So we have,

[tex] v = c/T = 2 \pi r/T[/tex]

Okay, so as a first step, plug the last equation into v in the fourth equation, and show that the result is,

[tex] T^2 = \frac{4 \pi^2 r^3}{GM}[/tex]

Which is the equation from before.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K