Question about quantum tunneling?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of quantum tunneling and the implications of superluminal speeds for particles outside their Hubble sphere. It establishes that while particles have a non-zero probability of being detected at various locations due to their wave-function dispersion, classical mechanics and relativity impose limits on their actual speeds. The Gaussian wave-packet model suggests a small probability of immediate detection, but this does not translate to faster-than-light (FTL) travel due to relativistic constraints. Experimental attempts to observe FTL detection in elementary particles have not yielded conclusive results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly wave-particle duality
  • Familiarity with Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle
  • Knowledge of Gaussian wave-packet dispersion
  • Basic concepts of special relativity and its implications on particle speed
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle on particle behavior
  • Study the properties and applications of Gaussian wave-packets in quantum mechanics
  • Explore experimental setups aimed at detecting superluminal speeds in quantum particles
  • Examine the relationship between quantum mechanics and special relativity in detail
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in the nuances of particle behavior and the limitations imposed by relativity.

zeromodz
Messages
244
Reaction score
0
You know how every particle has a non zero probability of being anywhere, but what about outside the particles Hubble sphere? In other words, does is there exist a nonzero probability that a particle can travel at superluminal speeds across the universe?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is a good question.

Let me set it up a tad more carefully... bear with me:
When a particle shows up, it may find itself with a well-defined, but not exact, position and then zip off into space. Since it's position is known to some extent, it has a range of momenta (Heisenberg's Uncertainty) so it's wave-function is dispersive.
dispersion of gaussian wavepacket

The classical speed of the particle would be the group velocity of the wavepacket.
But this picture means that there is a non-zero probability of the particle traveling a distance in less time than that implied by it's classical speed.
More precisely: it may detected before it could get there at it's average speed.

The question then becomes - could this get early enough that the detection implies FTL?

The above wave-packet, being gaussian, does not actually have zero amplitude anywhere: it extends to infinity.
This means that the above picture includes arbitrarily high momenta.
More to the point, it means there is a small but non-zero probability that our detector goes off immediately!

But the picture does not account for relativity.

We could argue that since the probability of finding a (massive) particle with v = c is zero, then relativity should contribute to the shape of the wavepacket too.

See:
http://www.ece.rutgers.edu/~orfanidi/ewa/ch03.pdf
... section on causality and fig 3.2.1

The pulse ends up having a signal front which cannot be faster than the speed of light.

iirc. there were a few experiments set up to disprove this for elementary particles - to try to see if FTL detection could occur with carefully prepared wavefuctions... but they never came to anything.

Anyway: back to your question...
even though non-relativistic wave-mechanics gives you results that imply that a particle may have a non-zero chance of being anywhere in the Universe, this is not literally the case in real life. It is a model with approximations in it, and, importantly, the model does not allow for relativity.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
697
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K