Question about summation in power spectral density formula

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of the Power Spectral Density (PSD) for a digital Non-Return-to-Zero (NRZ) pulse train as presented in Leon Couch's "Digital and Analog Communications Systems." The key equation for PSD is defined as \(\mathit{P(s)} = \frac{\left |F(f) \right |^{2}}{T}\sum_{k=- \infty}^{\infty}R(k)e^{j2\pi kfT}\). The confusion arises from the treatment of the zero-frequency term \(R(0)\) and its contribution to the summation, with the correct interpretation leading to \(\mathit{P(s)} = \frac{A^{2}}{4}\frac{\left |F(f) \right |^{2}}{T}\left [2+\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}e^{j2\pi kfT} +\sum_{k=-\infty}^{-1}e^{j2\pi kfT} \right ]\). Ultimately, the text's approach is validated by recognizing that the sum converges and allows for rearranging terms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Power Spectral Density (PSD) concepts
  • Familiarity with Fourier series and transforms
  • Knowledge of Non-Return-to-Zero (NRZ) signaling
  • Basic principles of signal processing
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Power Spectral Density in digital communications
  • Learn about Fourier series convergence and rearrangement techniques
  • Explore the implications of zero-frequency terms in signal analysis
  • Investigate the properties of Non-Return-to-Zero (NRZ) pulse trains
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in electrical engineering, particularly those focusing on digital communications, signal processing, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of Power Spectral Density calculations.

FrankJ777
Messages
140
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


This isn't really a problem I've been given, but questions i have about how the author of my textbook, Leon Couch, Digital and Analog communications Systems, found the PSD (power spectral density) of an digital NRZ pulse train.

Homework Equations


The PSD of a periodic signal is defined as: <br /> \mathit{P(s)} = \frac{\left |F(f) \right |^{2}}{T}\sum_{k=- \infty}^{\infty}R(k)e^{j2\pi kfT}<br />
The text shows that: R(0) = \frac{A^{2}}{2}, R(k\neq 0)=\frac{A^{2}}{4}
In the next step he shows that: \mathit{P(s)} = \frac{A^{2}}{4}\frac{\left |F(f) \right |^{2}}{T}\left [1+\sum_{k=- \infty}^{\infty}e^{j2\pi kfT} \right ]
This is where I start being confused. It seems as though he factored the R(0) term out of the sum and then factored the R(0) = \frac{A^{2}}{2}, R(k\neq 0)=\frac{A^{2}}{4} factors out of the summation leaving \mathit{P(s)} = \frac{A^{2}}{4}\frac{\left |F(f) \right |^{2}}{T}\left [1+\sum_{k=- \infty}^{\infty}e^{j2\pi kfT} \right ]
To me this doesn't seem right because when factoring the R(0) term out of the summation, the interval of summation is still from negative infinity to infinity, so zero is still in that interval. Also it seems that when he factors all the R(k) factors out of the summation, he doesn't account for the fact that R(0) = \frac{A^{2}}{2}

The Attempt at a Solution


To me it seems that it the step should have looked like this: \mathit{P(s)} = \frac{A^{2}}{4}\frac{\left |F(f) \right |^{2}}{T}\left [2+\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}e^{j2\pi kfT} +\sum_{k=-\infty}^{-1}e^{j2\pi kfT} \right ]
This way R(0) is not in the summation interval after its been pulled out, and the two separate summations account for the intervals from negative infinity to -1, then from 1 to infinity, and R(0) remains separate.
Also this way both when R(0) = \frac{A^{2}}{2}, R(k\neq 0)=\frac{A^{2}}{4} are factored out, the number 2 is left where the R(0) factor was, which i think is correct.
Can someone please point out if my line of thinking is correct, or please explain to me why the text is correct?
Thanks a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
FrankJ777 said:
The PSD of a periodic signal is defined as: <br /> \mathit{P(s)} = \frac{\left |F(f) \right |^{2}}{T}\sum_{k=- \infty}^{\infty}R(k)e^{j2\pi kfT}<br />
The text shows that: R(0) = \frac{A^{2}}{2}, R(k\neq 0)=\frac{A^{2}}{4}
In the next step he shows that: \mathit{P(s)} = \frac{A^{2}}{4}\frac{\left |F(f) \right |^{2}}{T}\left [1+\sum_{k=- \infty}^{\infty}e^{j2\pi kfT} \right ]

As a Fourier series, the first term is ##\frac{A^2/2}{2}=\frac{A^2}{4}## (i.e., divided by ##2##). That, I believe, is what's going on here.

EDIT (Again D: )
OK! My bad.

What's happening here is this. The sum converges, so we rearrange a finite number of terms (i.e., one term) and notice that at ##k=0## we obtain your desired coefficient since ##1+e^{0}=2## and ##2A^2/4=A^2/2##.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K