Question about the helicity operator

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jdstokes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Helicity Operator
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The helicity operator, represented as \vec{\Sigma}\cdot \vec{p} /|\vec{p}|, is crucial in relativistic quantum field theory for analyzing Dirac spinors. The discussion confirms that \vec{\Sigma}\cdot \vec{a} commutes with the Dirac Hamiltonian only when \vec{a} is proportional to \vec{p}. The analysis involves the use of Einstein summation and properties of gamma matrices, leading to the conclusion that the anti-symmetry of the Levi-Civita symbol \epsilon_{ijk} results in vanishing terms when combined with symmetric derivatives. Mastery of the helicity operator is essential for particle physicists, as noted in the reference to F. Gross's work.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Dirac Hamiltonian and Dirac spinors
  • Familiarity with gamma matrices and their properties
  • Knowledge of the Levi-Civita symbol and its symmetry properties
  • Basic principles of relativistic quantum field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the helicity operator in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the angular momentum operator in the context of quantum field theory
  • Explore F. Gross's "Relativistic Quantum Mechanics and Field Theory" for deeper insights
  • Investigate the Jacob and Wick formalism in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, as well as graduate students seeking to deepen their understanding of helicity and its implications in particle physics.

jdstokes
Messages
520
Reaction score
1
In relativistic quantum field theory the Dirac spinors can be chosen to be eigenstates of the helicity operator \vec{\Sigma}\cdot \vec{p} /|\vec{p}|.

I want to show that \vec{\Sigma}\cdot \vec{a} commutes with the Dirac Hamiltonian only if \vec{a}\propto \vec{p}. As usual I'm using Einstein summation everywhere.

[\vec{\Sigma}\cdot \vec{a}, H_\mathrm{Dirac}]\psi=[\vec{\Sigma}\cdot \vec{a}, -i\hbar c \gamma^i\partial_i + mc^2]\psi =-i\hbar c[\Sigma^ia_i, \gamma^i \partial_i]\psi

[\Sigma^i a_i, \gamma^l \partial_l]\psi=[\frac{i}{2}\epsilon^{ijk}\gamma_j\gamma_k a_i, \gamma^l \partial_l]\psi= \frac{i}{2}\epsilon_{ijk}[\gamma^j\gamma^k a^i, \gamma^l \partial_l]\psi = \frac{i}{2}\epsilon_{ijk}(\gamma^j\gamma^k a^i \gamma^l \partial_l-\gamma^l \partial_l\gamma^j\gamma^k a^i ]\psi

since \epsilon^{ijk} = \epsilon_{ijk}(-1)^3 and \gamma_i = -\gamma^i,\, a_i = -a^i in flat spacetime with (+,-,-,-) signature.

Now suppose a^i = \partial^i. Then using equality of mixed partials and dividing out any constants gives

\epsilon_{ijk}(\gamma^j\gamma^k\gamma^l \partial_l\partial^i\psi - \gamma^l\gamma^j\gamma^k \partial_l\partial^i \psi)

Using the relation \{ \gamma^\mu,\gamma^\nu \} = 2\eta^{\mu\nu} twice and the fact that \eta^{ij}\partial_i = \partial^j in flat spacetime gives

\epsilon_{ijk}(\gamma^k \partial^j - \gamma^j\partial^k)\partial^i \psi

Now, in the sum over k,j the term in brackets is anti-symmetric but so is \epsilon_{ijk} so I don't see why this should vanish.

Any help would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Woops \epsilon_{ijk} is symmetric in j,k since \epsilon^{ijk} is anti-symmetric.

Edit: Hang on, \epsilon_{ijk} should still be anti-symmetric, just differing in sign from \epsilon^{ijk}. I still don't see why this should vanish?
 
Last edited:
Presumably \partial^j \partial k^k is symmetric in j,k.
 
Sorry I didn't understand what you wrote. Are you suggesting something along these lines?

\epsilon_{ijk}\gamma^k\partial^j = -\epsilon_{ikj}\gamma^k\partial^j = -\epsilon_{ijk}\gamma^j\partial^k.

Therefore

\epsilon_{ijk}(\gamma^k\partial^j - \gamma^j\partial^k)\partial^i\psi = -4\epsilon_{ijk}\gamma^j\partial^k\partial^i\psi.

But

\epsilon_{ijk} is anti-symmetric in i,k whereas \partial^i\partial^k is symmetric in i,k. Therefore each term in the sum over j vanishes.
 
Last edited:
Um, yes... each term actually vanishes separately, the gamma matrix is simply along for the ride.
 
You'll find it much easier to work directly with standard Dirac solutions in two component form, which are built around the helicity operator. Or look up the angular momentum operator -- see, for example, F. Gross's Relativistic Quantum Mechanics and Field Theory.

Helicity, with a fixed direction of course, commutes with free Hamiltonians for any spin. This is the basis for the elegant Jacob and Wick formalism -- something every particle physicist should master.
Regards,
Reilly Atkinson
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K